2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary intake modification in response to a participation in a resistance training program for sedentary older adults with prediabetes: Findings from the Resist Diabetes study

Abstract: Engagement in one type of health behavior change may exert a “spillover” effect resulting in other behavior changes. Few studies have examined dietary intake following prolonged training, and none have evaluated spontaneous dietary changes beyond alterations in energy or macronutrient intake following initiation of strength/resistance training (RT). The purpose of this observational investigation was to determine if spontaneous dietary intake modifications occur in response to initiation of an RT program, amon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be an example of the “spill-over” effect whereby engagement in one type of health related behaviour has a positive influence on engagement in others [ 60 ]. It has been shown from cross-sectional data that active individuals are more likely to display other healthy behaviours [ 61 ] including reduced fat intake [ 62 ], while women who were overweight reduced total energy intake during 12 weeks of resistance exercise [ 63 ]. Interestingly, this was not seen with the StructEx intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be an example of the “spill-over” effect whereby engagement in one type of health related behaviour has a positive influence on engagement in others [ 60 ]. It has been shown from cross-sectional data that active individuals are more likely to display other healthy behaviours [ 61 ] including reduced fat intake [ 62 ], while women who were overweight reduced total energy intake during 12 weeks of resistance exercise [ 63 ]. Interestingly, this was not seen with the StructEx intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Resist Diabetes trial was designed to assess if an RT protocol entailing training twice per week and involving 12 sets per session could reduce prediabetes prevalence and improve strength in a supervised clinical setting, and then be successfully translated and maintained without direct supervision in community settings by implementing a Social Cognitive Theory (SCT)-based maintenance intervention. Using results from this trial, we previously reported that the initiation of RT was associated with short-term changes in dietary intake (e.g., reduced intake of carbohydrates and total sugars [ 20 ], that short-term improvements in glucose tolerance with RT initiation may be limited to individuals with prediabetes who have IGT (vs isolated IFG) [ 21 ], RT adherence and cost estimates of the Standard and SCT-based intervention conditions [ 22 ], The current article presents the main trial outcomes. The primary objective of this trial was to determine whether an SCT-based intervention improves RT maintenance and muscular strength, and reduces prediabetes prevalence among older adults with prediabetes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the primary focus of the SSB reduction intervention, it was expected that the IMM-BEVQ would detect significant decreases in SSB consumption and significant increases in low energy density beverages over the six-month intervention for SIPsmartER participants [ 30 ]. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that exposure to beverage related questions throughout the intervention and during data collection [ 30 ], as well as increased physical activity [ 42 ], could have influenced MoveMore participant’s beverage intake behaviors during the six-month period. Accordingly, the results exhibited significantly decreased consumption of individual and total SSB (e.g., regular soft drinks, sweet tea, sweetened coffee) and significantly increased consumption of low energy density beverages (e.g., water).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%