2019
DOI: 10.1177/1557988319891350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary Intakes Differ by Body Composition Goals: An Observational Study of Professional Rugby Union Players in New Zealand

Abstract: Preseason in rugby union is a period of intensive training where players undergo conditioning to prepare for the competitive season. In some cases, this includes modifying body composition through weight gain or fat loss. This study aimed to describe the macronutrient intakes of professional rugby union players during pre-season training. It was hypothesized that players required to gain weight would have a higher energy, carbohydrate and protein intake compared to those needing to lose weight. Twenty-three pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean relative protein intake was slightly lower within our study for both forwards (2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.7 ± 0.5 g·kg·day −1 ) and backs (2.4 ± 0.5 vs. 2.7 ± 0.3 g·kg·day −1 ), while mean relative fat intake was higher within our study for both forwards (1.8 ± 0.4 vs. 1.4 ± 0.2 g·kg·day −1 ) and backs (1.8 ± 0.5 vs. 1.4 ± 0.3 g·kg·day −1 ) compared to Bradley et al [ 7 ]. In comparison to dietary intakes reported during the pre-season period among professional RU players, mean absolute energy intakes were higher within our in-season study, yet relative macronutrient intakes were similar regardless of seasonal period [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mean relative protein intake was slightly lower within our study for both forwards (2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.7 ± 0.5 g·kg·day −1 ) and backs (2.4 ± 0.5 vs. 2.7 ± 0.3 g·kg·day −1 ), while mean relative fat intake was higher within our study for both forwards (1.8 ± 0.4 vs. 1.4 ± 0.2 g·kg·day −1 ) and backs (1.8 ± 0.5 vs. 1.4 ± 0.3 g·kg·day −1 ) compared to Bradley et al [ 7 ]. In comparison to dietary intakes reported during the pre-season period among professional RU players, mean absolute energy intakes were higher within our in-season study, yet relative macronutrient intakes were similar regardless of seasonal period [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…However, similar research within RU players is required to provide further insight regarding glycogen utilisation. Interestingly, these “lower” carbohydrate intakes (≈3.5 g·kg·day −1 ) have supported improvements in physical performance and body composition measures during pre-season phases composed of high-intensity and high-volume glycogen depleting training sessions [ 17 , 18 ], suggesting these intakes may be adequate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although low BMD does not appear to be a concern within this group of elite athletes, DXA is valuable to identify any athletes with low BMD. Greater insight into the movement demands, training load, and energy requirements of elite female RU players would also be valuable due to the associations between training and nutrition for optimizing body composition [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the nutritional practices of professional RU players have reported common trends regarding dietary intake. Players consume a relatively low carbohydrate (~3.5 g·kg of Body Mass [BM] per day −1 ), high protein (>2.0 g·kgBM·day −1 ) and moderate-high fat diet (>1.4 g·kgBM·day −1 ) [ 1 , 6 , 10 , 13 , 14 ] compared to nutritional recommendations for team-sport athletes (carbohydrate = 5–8 g·kgBM·day −1 ; protein = 1.7–2.2 g·kgBM·day −1 ; fat = 30–50% of total energy intake) [ 15 , 16 ]. It is recommended that team-sport athletes consume an adequate energy and macronutrient intake in order to offset energy expenditure, increase glycogen stores and repair body tissues [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%