2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.10.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary lecithin improves dressing percentage and decreases chewiness in the longissimus muscle in finisher gilts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation between objective measures (compression and shear force) and sensory evaluation of eating quality attributes especially tenderness has shown to be extremely variable, especially at low shear forces [ 23 ]. In light of this, it is possible that the reduction in hardness and chewiness values observed in the present studies and those of D’Souza et al [ 10 ] and Akit et al [ 11 ] were insufficient to decrease the shear force of pork considered tender (shear force < 5 kg) pork. In the only study where sensory studies were conducted on pork from pigs fed dietary lecithin, there was no effect of 8 g/kg dietary lecithin on shear force, juiciness or tenderness there was a decrease in pork that scored below average and therefore failed to satisfy consumers [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The correlation between objective measures (compression and shear force) and sensory evaluation of eating quality attributes especially tenderness has shown to be extremely variable, especially at low shear forces [ 23 ]. In light of this, it is possible that the reduction in hardness and chewiness values observed in the present studies and those of D’Souza et al [ 10 ] and Akit et al [ 11 ] were insufficient to decrease the shear force of pork considered tender (shear force < 5 kg) pork. In the only study where sensory studies were conducted on pork from pigs fed dietary lecithin, there was no effect of 8 g/kg dietary lecithin on shear force, juiciness or tenderness there was a decrease in pork that scored below average and therefore failed to satisfy consumers [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…D’Souza et al [ 10 ] reported that 3 g/kg dietary lecithin supplementation reduced hardness and chewiness values of the m. Semitendinosus, whilst in this experiment, the reduced hardness and chewiness values of the m. Longissimus thoracis were reported for the 15 g/kg and 75 g/kg lecithin treatments and not the 3 g/kg lecithin treatment group. The study by Akit et al [ 11 ] found that lecithin at 4, 20 and 80 g/kg reduced cohesiveness and chewiness of the m. Longissimus lumborum with no statistical within lecithin dose effects. However, the hardness values for pork from pigs fed 4 g/kg were intermediate between controls and those fed 20 g/kg [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations