Both the intake of fat, especially saturated trans fatty acids, and refined carbohydrates, particularly sugar, have been linked to increased risk of obesity, diabetes and CVD. Dietary guidelines are generally similar throughout the world, restrict both intake of SFA and added sugar to no more than 10 and 35 % energy for total fat and recommend 50 % energy from carbohydrates being derived from unrefined cereals, tubers, fruit and vegetables. Current evidence favours partial replacement of SFA with PUFA with regard to risk of CVD. The translation of these macronutrient targets into food-based dietary guidelines is more complex because some high-fat foods play an important part in meeting nutrient requirements as well as influencing the risk of chronic disease. Some of the recent controversies surrounding the significance of sugar and the type of fat in the diet are discussed. Finally, data from a recently published randomised controlled trial are presented to show the impact of following current dietary guidelines on cardiovascular risk and nutrient intake compared with a traditional UK diet. In 1984, the UK Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy first recommended that no more than 30-35 and 10 % of dietary energy be derived from total and SFA respectively to prevent CVD and updated its advice to include the replacement of SFA with MUFA and to increase the intake of long-chain n-3 PUFA from oily fish in 1994(1) . More than 30 years later a meta-analysis of the clinical trials available at the time has concluded that these guidelines for dietary fat intake should never have been made (2) . However, this fails to recognise that at the time the UK was experiencing a major epidemic of CHD and there was strong evidence that the intake of SFA increased serum cholesterol, which was causally involved in the atherogenic process that leads to CHD. Furthermore, reducing the intake of fat was seen to be a means of reducing SFA as leading sources of both SFA and total fat were meat and dairy products. Indeed, intakes of total fat and saturated fat and serum cholesterol have fallen in the UK as discussed elsewhere (3) . Furthermore, it is to be noted that CVD mortality has fallen by more than 55 % since 1997 in the UK (4) for reasons that remain uncertain. The lack of epidemiological evidence from a comprehensive meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies (5) supporting the contention that SFA intake is associated with increased risk of death from CVD is in contrast to the findings based mainly on US data that the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) (6) and refined carbohydrates with high glycaemic index is associated with a greater risk (7) . This has led some commentators to suggest that sugar is to blame for CVD rather than SFA (8) and that it is time to end the war on fat. This has resulted in a rash of media articles suggesting that it is healthy to eat fatty meat and full-fat dairy products. However, a more recent meta-analysis including previously unpublished results from prospective cohort studies shows...