Dietary reporting errors on 24 h recalls and dietary questionnaires are associated with BMI across six European countries as evaluated with recovery biomarkers for protein and potassium intake

Abstract

Whether there are differences between countries in the validity of self-reported diet in relation to BMI, as evaluated using recovery biomarkers, is not well understood. We aimed to evaluate BMI-related reporting errors on 24 h dietary recalls (24-HDR) and on dietary questionnaires (DQ) using biomarkers for protein and K intake and whether the BMI effect differs between six European countries. Between 1995 and 1999, 1086 men and women participating in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition completed a single 24-HDR, a DQ and one 24 h urine collection. In regression analysis, controlling for age, sex, education and country, each unit (1 kg/m2) increase in BMI predicted an approximately 1·7 and 1·3 % increase in protein under-reporting on 24-HDR and DQ, respectively (both P < 0·0001). Exclusion of individuals who probably misreported energy intake attenuated BMI-related bias on both instruments. The BMI effect on protein under-reporting did not differ for men and women and neither between countries on both instruments as tested by interaction (all P>0·15). In women, but not in men, the DQ yielded higher mean intakes of protein that were closer to the biomarker-based measurements across BMI groups when compared with 24-HDR. Results for K were similar to those of protein, although BMI-related under-reporting of K was of a smaller magnitude, suggesting differential misreporting of foods. Under-reporting of protein and K appears to be predicted by BMI, but this effect may be driven by ‘low-energy reporters’. The BMI effect on under-reporting seems to be the same across countries.

Main nutrient patterns are associated with prospective weight change in adults from 10 European countries

“…We attempted to minimize this bias by using energyadjusted nutrient intakes and by excluding participants with implausible diet reporting. The latter has been shown to partly account for BMI-related dietary under-reporting [36]. Fourth, we were limited by the number of nutrients available in the harmonized nutrient database (i.e., 23 compounds) to derive patterns.…”

Measuring Population Sodium Intake: A Review of Methods

“…Subjects may change their behaviour when collecting dietary information prospectively (such as in a weighed diet record), and under-reporting of intake, both generally and of particular foods and nutrients has been reported in the literature [8,9]. Sodium intake is highly correlated with total energy intake, due to its inclusion in a wide variety of foods and meals [10].…”

Availability of two self-administered diet history questionnaires for pregnant Japanese women: A validation study using 24-hour urinary markers

“…Protein and potassium intake are used as alternative markers to explore the validity of overall dietary intake because these nutrients are present in a variety of foods 14, 15, 16, 17. For example, protein is primarily found in meat, fish, beans, and cereals, while potassium is present in fruits, vegetables, beans, and potatoes.…”