2024
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58487-9
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary restriction reveals sex-specific expression of the mTOR pathway genes in Japanese quails

Gebrehaweria K. Reda,
Sawadi F. Ndunguru,
Brigitta Csernus
et al.

Abstract: Limited resources affect an organism’s physiology through the conserved metabolic pathway, the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR). Males and females often react differently to nutritional limitation, but whether it leads to differential mTOR pathway expression remains unknown. Recently, we found that dietary restriction (DR) induced significant changes in the expression of mTOR pathway genes in female Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica). We simultaneously exposed 32 male and female Japanese quails to eithe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the observed effect trend in males aligned with the previously reported trend in body mass (Reda, Ndunguru, Csernus, Knop, Lugata, et al, 2024), females exhibited a different pattern, wherein the effect on body mass intensified with the severity of restriction .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While the observed effect trend in males aligned with the previously reported trend in body mass (Reda, Ndunguru, Csernus, Knop, Lugata, et al, 2024), females exhibited a different pattern, wherein the effect on body mass intensified with the severity of restriction .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…As we have previously reported, DR substantially reduced body mass in both female and male birds, though the effect was more pronounced in females (Reda, Ndunguru, Csernus, Knop, Lugata, et al, 2024;.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations