2000
DOI: 10.1097/00008483-200007000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary Sodium Intake and Subsequent Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Overweight Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
76
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A further limitation is that the Kawasaki formula was initially developed and validated in Asians free of CV disease 18,19 while our cohort included patients at high CV risk, and the majority were non-Asian. We report a correlation coefficient between Kawasaki formuladerived estimates and 24-hour urinary estimates for sodium of 0.55 in a nonAsian population, which is stronger than the correlation reported between 24-hour urine and 24-hour dietary recall methods in the TONE trial (and 24-hour dietary recall has been used in a number of previous large studies for estimating sodium intake 7,11,12 ). Although we would expect this potential source of measurement bias to influence absolute estimates of sodium intake, it is less likely to alter the shape of association reported on cubic spline plots.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A further limitation is that the Kawasaki formula was initially developed and validated in Asians free of CV disease 18,19 while our cohort included patients at high CV risk, and the majority were non-Asian. We report a correlation coefficient between Kawasaki formuladerived estimates and 24-hour urinary estimates for sodium of 0.55 in a nonAsian population, which is stronger than the correlation reported between 24-hour urine and 24-hour dietary recall methods in the TONE trial (and 24-hour dietary recall has been used in a number of previous large studies for estimating sodium intake 7,11,12 ). Although we would expect this potential source of measurement bias to influence absolute estimates of sodium intake, it is less likely to alter the shape of association reported on cubic spline plots.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Previous individual prospective cohort studies have either reported a positive association, no association, or an inverse relationship between sodium intake and CV mortality. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Discrepant findings of previous studies are likely due to differences in ranges of sodium intake, study populations, methods of measurement, and failure to explore a nonlinear association. For example, the NHANES-II study, 12 the first to report an association between low sodium intake and CV mortality, had a mean sodium intake of 2.7 g per day while the studies reporting the strongest association between high sodium intake and CV mortality had mean intakes of about 4 g per day.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two studies suggesting that a low salt diet might be harmful can, however, be offset by three other studies the first of which was based on the same NHANES-1 data file [14]. No relationship was found between reported salt intake and any form of cardiovascular disease in 6797 non-overweight men and women.…”
Section: Salt Intake and Cardiovascular Diseasementioning
confidence: 96%
“…All suffer from the imprecision of a single urine collection, and the multiple limitations inherent in epidemiological research. Professor Beevers favors the two studies that support his view [9,14]. I am partial to the two published by our group [1,2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%