2018
DOI: 10.25115/psye.v10i1.1048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diferencias en el autoconcepto, las atribuciones causales y la ansiedad-rasgo asociadas a la edad, el género y el grupo instrumental del alumnado de conservatorio

Abstract: El objetivo de este estudio consistió en analizar las diferencias asociadas al género, la edad y el grupo instrumental en el alumnado de conservatorio en las múltiples dimensiones del autoconcepto, las  atribuciones causales, y la ansiedad-rasgo. Las variables se midieron a través del Cuestionario de Autoconcepto Musical (CAMU), el Cuestionario Multidimensional de Autoconcepto (AUDIM), la escala basada en el modelo bidimensional de Weiner (1974) sobre atribuciones causales y la Escala de Ansiedad Estad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…16 to 17 years old, are those who have the lowest self-efficacy profile. This is in line with previous studies (Orejudo et al, 2021; Papageorgi et al, 2007; Zubeldia et al, 2018), in which students of the same age perceived a lesser degree of social support in music-oriented activities, and also displayed a greater amount of performance anxiety. The simplest way to interpret these findings is to note that students at that age are required to decide about their professional future, and they have a considerable study load to face in nonmusical subjects as well, as they are finishing high school in the two last bachillerato courses and will have to pass the selectividad exam which grants them access to university; many of them will no longer opt to continue studying music in a conservatorio superior .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…16 to 17 years old, are those who have the lowest self-efficacy profile. This is in line with previous studies (Orejudo et al, 2021; Papageorgi et al, 2007; Zubeldia et al, 2018), in which students of the same age perceived a lesser degree of social support in music-oriented activities, and also displayed a greater amount of performance anxiety. The simplest way to interpret these findings is to note that students at that age are required to decide about their professional future, and they have a considerable study load to face in nonmusical subjects as well, as they are finishing high school in the two last bachillerato courses and will have to pass the selectividad exam which grants them access to university; many of them will no longer opt to continue studying music in a conservatorio superior .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The strength of this research relies on comparing adolescents' self-concept before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as estimating differences based on gender and the practice of physical activity. This is a crucial area of research since self-concept is a pivotal construct in adolescence [40,41], given its association with quality and life satisfaction, and because it is influenced by social, physical, emotional, academic and family features [40,42,43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, boys had higher levels in physical and emotional self-concept before the lockdown, while girls' emotional self-concept was correlated to support and proximity of family and peers. Males usually have higher emotional and physical self-concept, whereas females tend to have higher academic and family self-concept [19,41,46,[48][49][50][51]. Age intensifies this difference, and some aspects were revealed, such as peers' relations, academic performance or motor-perceptive skills consolidation [21,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se ha destacado la importancia que tienen las atribuciones causales en los resultados académicos de los estudiantes (Houston, 2016;Zubeldia et al, 2018;Sáez et al, 2018). Sin embargo, los instrumentos que se emplean para examinar las atribuciones en este ámbito suelen carecer o no exhiben evidencias de las propiedades psicométricas que brinden soporte a su estructura factorial y corroboren la validez convergente y confiabilidad en la población objetivo.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Uno de los ámbitos en los que frecuentemente se han vinculado las atribuciones es el académico (Houston, 2016;Zubeldia et al, 2018;Sáez, Bustos et al, 2018). La necesidad de examinar las atribuciones en este ambiente es sustancial, ya que la escuela es un espacio de continua evaluación en el que el tipo de atribuciones podrían afectar el potencial de los estudiantes (Dweck & Yeager, 2019;Farrington et al, 2012;Hamm et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified