2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2210.01776
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DiffDock: Diffusion Steps, Twists, and Turns for Molecular Docking

Abstract: Predicting the binding structure of a small molecule ligand to a protein-a task known as molecular docking-is critical to drug design. Recent deep learning methods that treat docking as a regression problem have decreased runtime compared to traditional search-based methods but have yet to offer substantial improvements in accuracy. We instead frame molecular docking as a generative modeling problem and develop DIFFDOCK, a diffusion generative model over the non-Euclidean manifold of ligand poses. To do so, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
177
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
177
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years there have been many advances in deep learning model architectures for analyzing molecules. [42][43][44][45][46] A deep learning model, however, is only as good as the dataset it is trained on. Previous attempts to utilize machine learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction often trained on PDBbind, but the small size and bias inherent to the dataset have hindered their utility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years there have been many advances in deep learning model architectures for analyzing molecules. [42][43][44][45][46] A deep learning model, however, is only as good as the dataset it is trained on. Previous attempts to utilize machine learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction often trained on PDBbind, but the small size and bias inherent to the dataset have hindered their utility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physics-based, empirical, knowledge-based, and machine learning-based scoring functions are available [ 202 ]. Additionally, new deep learning methods such as EquiBind, GNINA, DiffDock are developed to predict the binding mode between the ligand and a specific protein target [ 203 , 204 , 205 ]. Especially, Equibind and Diffdock have the potential to significantly change the VS landscape.…”
Section: Computer-aided Drug Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method significantly speeds up with better quality compared to traditional docking methods [ 203 ]. DiffDock is a diffusion generative model over the non-Euclidean manifold of ligand poses, which has fast inference times and provides confidence estimates with high selective accuracy outperforming the previous traditional docking and deep learning methods [ 205 ]. GNINA utilizes an ensemble of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) as a scoring function and improves the quality of scoring and ranking binding poses for protein-ligand complexes [ 204 ].…”
Section: Computer-aided Drug Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both EquiBind and TANKBind are substantially faster than traditional docking programs. DiffDock, which is a diffusion generative model, was developed by the same research group as EquiBind, and their results indicate that it can be more accurate than any of the two previously mentioned blind docking methods (100). On the other hand it is considerably slower than EquiBind or TANKBind, however, it is still faster than most traditional docking programs.…”
Section: Virtual Screening Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%