2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-021-03160-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference-based Equivalent Static Load Method with adaptive time selection and local stiffness adaption

Abstract: Structural optimization of crash-related problems usually involves nonlinearities in geometry, material, and contact. The Equivalent Static Load (ESL) method provides a method to solve such problems. It has previously been extended to employ an individual Finite Element model describing the deformed geometry at each considered time step under the name Difference-based Equivalent Static Load (DiESL) method. This paper demonstrates how an appropriate selection of the time steps in each cycle can further improve … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As outlook we refer to some important methodical improvements for the individual steps. Looking on the first phase, the linearization of nonlinear structural requirements can be improved or automatized by new developments like the DiESL method 48,50,64 , providing a well-defined procedure to linearize crash load cases. The adoption of this methodology would involve several advantages: first, nonlinearities in geometry and material-prominent in crash-would find consideration in the linear auxiliary load cases, resulting in an improved approximation of the actual crash load cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As outlook we refer to some important methodical improvements for the individual steps. Looking on the first phase, the linearization of nonlinear structural requirements can be improved or automatized by new developments like the DiESL method 48,50,64 , providing a well-defined procedure to linearize crash load cases. The adoption of this methodology would involve several advantages: first, nonlinearities in geometry and material-prominent in crash-would find consideration in the linear auxiliary load cases, resulting in an improved approximation of the actual crash load cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%