2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2741144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference between bending and stretching moduli of single-walled carbon nanotubes that are modeled as an elastic tube

Abstract: Very-high-strength (60-GPa) carbon nanotube fiber design based on molecular dynamics simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 for reference) the value of the thickness determined in this way may exceed 90% of the radius of the tube, which is obviously in contradiction to the basic assumption of the thin-walled tube model. The same conclusion was also obtained for a (5,5) SWCNT by DiBiasio et al (2007).…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…8 for reference) the value of the thickness determined in this way may exceed 90% of the radius of the tube, which is obviously in contradiction to the basic assumption of the thin-walled tube model. The same conclusion was also obtained for a (5,5) SWCNT by DiBiasio et al (2007).…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, as pointed by DiBiasio et al (2007), surface Young's modulus E s bending associated with the lateral bending deformation is 291 N/m, which is 19.3% larger than the surface Young's modulus E s tension associated with the axial stretching deformation (E s tension ¼ 242 N=m). In DiBiasio et al's work, the thickness of the SWCNT has been taken as t =0.075 nm.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to SM approaches, the MM method also allows the natural frequencies of the system in equilibrium to be computed without any requirement to use an equivalent thickness value for the nanostructure. In general, the introduction of the thickness concept in nanomaterials is highly contentious, leading to the well-known 'Yakobson's paradox' [41,42], responsible for the high scattering of Young's moduli and Poisson's ratio results in the open literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%