2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.03.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference between chemical structures of the interface at the Al-oxide tunneling barrier prepared by plasma or by radical oxidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shift towards higher binding energy at 1000 °C is a consequence of accelerated B desorption and the formation of Al-oxides. [43][44][45] We note that our XPS did not detect the B 1s spectrum (see supplemental information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The shift towards higher binding energy at 1000 °C is a consequence of accelerated B desorption and the formation of Al-oxides. [43][44][45] We note that our XPS did not detect the B 1s spectrum (see supplemental information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Such mixed oxides naturally have an imperfect microstructure, and metallic ions or oxygen vacancies are likely to exist in the matrix. 23 The oxygen-deficient AlOx phase has been reported to provide the electron trapping sites 24 and can be a reason behind the SCLC conduction observed in our device as observed during I-V measurements in HRS. In our fabricated RS device, the presence of self-compliance feature may also be attributed to the formation of AlOx layer near the top electrode between Al and CFO.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%