Difference Between Engineering Men and Women: How and Why They Choose What They Do During Early Career

Abstract

Retention of the engineering workforce is of national importance for global competitiveness. Retention of women engineers is of particular interest because of the impact of their lower starting representation and higher attrition rate on workforce diversity. Exit rates from engineering careers are highest in the first 10 years after graduation. Thus, unlike most workforce retention research, this study focuses on participants who are still in the midst of this critical phase of their careers. We investigated what engineering graduates say about how and why they make early career pathway choices. The motivations for their choices were examined through the lens of gender differences (and similarities) while resting on the fundamental psychological framework provided by self-determination theory (SDT). SDT has demonstrated that the more behaviors are autonomously motivated, the more stable, the more fulfilling, and the more persistent those behaviors become. The current qualitative study is based on interviews with twenty-two early-career engineering graduates (eleven men and eleven women) from three geographically and culturally distinct institutions. While a majority of both men and women expressed autonomous motivations, the ways in which they were expressed imply different outcomes for career persistence. While the results presented herein do not have statistical significance because of small sample size and qualitative methodology, they do provide insight into the types of patterns that emerge from men and women in terms of how they view their careers from past, present, and future perspectives. Understanding these patterns will be helpful in identifying them among early career graduates in engineering and taking appropriate steps to support continued persistence in the field. Identification of these patterns is also helpful for designing a quantitative study that can point to the significance of gender differences in a larger population.

Action on Diversity: A Content Analysis of ASEE Conference Papers, 2015–2016

“…For example, understanding why women leave the engineering workforce (VanAntwerp & Wilson, 2015), how to improve the experiences of transfer students from community colleges into 4-year institutions (Pieri et al, 2015), and strategies for dual-career couples searching for employment in academia (Ciston et al, 2015).…”

Parental Support and Acceptance Determines Women’s Choice of Engineering as a Major

“…One such study explored motivations for early career choices among a small, representative group of 11 male and 11 female undergraduates. 12 Ultimately, the women and men studied were similarly motivated in their career choices, partitioned almost equally across the entire spectrum of Self Determination Theory. But, they discussed these motivations remarkably differently, with men especially interested in the technology while the women were much more focused on business-and people-related (i.e.…”

PANEL: After #MeToo: What’s next for Women in the Engineering Workplace?

“…However, there is not much evidence that lack of interest would fully explain the higher exit rate of women compared to men. A qualitative study reported that both men and women displayed a strong intrinsic interest in engineering work [77], but pointed out that intrinsic interests can be diminished over time as a result of the physical and social environment. Thus, a chilly or hostile climate could be intertwined in complex ways with career exits blamed simply on "change of interest."…”