2000
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference in blood pressure, but not in heart rate, between measurements performed at a health centre and at a hospital by one and the same physician

Abstract: Background: Blood pressure (BP) has been found to vary between examiners, for example it is often higher when measured by a physician than by a nurse. Whether the location for the physician-measured BP is also a source of variation has, however, not been studied. Hence, we found it of interest to find out if the location used for examination was of any significance. Objective: To explore if BP and/or heart rate measured in the same subjects by the same general practitioner in the health centre and at the hospi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the case of white coat hypertension (MacDonald et al, 1999; O’Brien et al, 2003), OWCH could be mediated by the degree of perceived control and threat related to the clinical context and the invasive and aversive properties of the measurement procedure. And similar to what has been found when measuring blood pressure (Enström, Pennert, & Lindholm, 2000), there may be an increased physiological arousal induced by certain contextual variables involved in the IOP assessment procedure in clinical contexts that could be judged as stressful by the patient (due to, for instance, the invasion of personal space, uncertainty regarding health status, or the presence of the clinician). This could induce artificially high IOP levels, which could lead to an overdiagnosis (due to false positives) of glaucoma.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…As in the case of white coat hypertension (MacDonald et al, 1999; O’Brien et al, 2003), OWCH could be mediated by the degree of perceived control and threat related to the clinical context and the invasive and aversive properties of the measurement procedure. And similar to what has been found when measuring blood pressure (Enström, Pennert, & Lindholm, 2000), there may be an increased physiological arousal induced by certain contextual variables involved in the IOP assessment procedure in clinical contexts that could be judged as stressful by the patient (due to, for instance, the invasion of personal space, uncertainty regarding health status, or the presence of the clinician). This could induce artificially high IOP levels, which could lead to an overdiagnosis (due to false positives) of glaucoma.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…4 In a study where one doctor measured the patients' blood pressure both in a primary health centre and at a hospital, the hospital readings exceeded by 9.4/6.0 mmHg (systolic and diastolic BP) the health centre readings. 5 Thus, the BP of hypertensive patients seems to vary depending on the environment and the measurer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%