2016
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference in contagious yawning between susceptible men and women: why not?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it has been argued that both the tendency for children with ASD to be less prone to contagious yawning [83] and the familiarity bias [37,84,85] can be explained in terms of differences in attending to yawners rather than differences in empathetic response. Similarly, the gender bias reported in humans [29] is not straightforward to interpret and there is debate over whether it simply reflects a false positive in the literature [33,34]. By contrast, proponents of the contagious yawning-empathy hypothesis argue that the familiarity bias continues to be found even when controlling for differences in subjects' attention [40,41] and that the negative results for the gender bias in previous studies reflects methodological issues with prior experiments [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, it has been argued that both the tendency for children with ASD to be less prone to contagious yawning [83] and the familiarity bias [37,84,85] can be explained in terms of differences in attending to yawners rather than differences in empathetic response. Similarly, the gender bias reported in humans [29] is not straightforward to interpret and there is debate over whether it simply reflects a false positive in the literature [33,34]. By contrast, proponents of the contagious yawning-empathy hypothesis argue that the familiarity bias continues to be found even when controlling for differences in subjects' attention [40,41] and that the negative results for the gender bias in previous studies reflects methodological issues with prior experiments [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, the gender bias reported in humans [29] is not straightforward to interpret and there is debate over whether it simply reflects a false positive in the literature [33,34]. By contrast, proponents of the contagious yawning-empathy hypothesis argue that the familiarity bias continues to be found even when controlling for differences in subjects' attention [40,41] and that the negative results for the gender bias in previous studies reflects methodological issues with prior experiments [34]. Furthermore, although alternative hypotheses such as the attentional hypothesis could explain the presence of a single bias such as the familiarity bias, only the contagious yawning-empathy hypothesis predicts the presence of all three biases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, in Hominini the yawning response can vary depending on the sex of the responder or the trigger. For example, women may respond more to others' yawns (Chan & Tseng, 2017 ; Norscia et al, 2016a , 2016b ), although this does not occur in all cohorts (Bartholomew & Cirulli, 2014 ; Norscia & Palagi, 2011 ). Moreover, in the Pan genus yawning response can vary in relation to the trigger's sex, possibly depending on the social role that each sex has in different species (Demuru & Palagi, 2012 ; Massen & Gallup, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the IRI shows clearly higher values for women. Hence, we also conclude that women are more empathetic than are men, presumably because women are “hard-wired for maternity and parental care” (Norscia et al, 2016b, p. 1; for a detailed discussion of the gender effect, see also Norscia, Demuru, & Palagi, 2016a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%