2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04612.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference in interpretation of computed tomography pulmonary angiography diagnosis of subsegmental thrombosis in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
52
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has recently been demonstrated that significant differences in the interpretation of SSPE among radiologists could occur. 20 Although all CTPAs were assessed according to a prespecified protocol, it cannot be ruled out that some of our patients were misclassified as having SSPE; this, however, reflects the diagnostic process of SSPE in daily clinical practice. Second, our definition used for SSPE included both single and multiple SSPE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It has recently been demonstrated that significant differences in the interpretation of SSPE among radiologists could occur. 20 Although all CTPAs were assessed according to a prespecified protocol, it cannot be ruled out that some of our patients were misclassified as having SSPE; this, however, reflects the diagnostic process of SSPE in daily clinical practice. Second, our definition used for SSPE included both single and multiple SSPE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Pena et al (43) and Donato et al (44), however, observed that patients with untreated isolated SSPE had no adverse events. It is likely that an individual patient's risk of a life threatening thromboembolic event is more closely related to the clot burden in the deep venous system, rather than the size of the initial PE.…”
Section: Potential Barriers To Implementationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite this, however, reported interobserver agreement varies widely, especially in the diagnosis of subsegmental PE [12]. Wide variations in concordance between general and subspecialist radiologists have been reported (89-100%) [13,14], as well as between residents, fellows, and attending radiologists (87-93%) [15][16][17]. Although pulmonary CTA examinations are frequently interpreted by general radiologists in most centers, limited data exist on the interobserver agreement between general and subspecialist chest radiologists.…”
Section: Overdiagnosis Of Pulmonary Embolism By Pulmonary Ct Angiographymentioning
confidence: 99%