2023
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06539-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference in risk of preterm and small-for-gestational-age birth depending on maternal occupations in Japan

Tasuku Okui

Abstract: Objectives In this study, an association between the mother’s occupations with preterm and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) births was investigated using national data in Japan, and individual-level birth data from the Report of Vital Statistics: Occupational and Industrial Aspects in the 2015 fiscal year were used. Preterm and SGA birth rates were calculated for each of infant characteristics, and relative risk of each type of maternal occupations (categorized into 12 types) for the outcomes wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the analysis, the time point variable, birth month (January, …, December), household occupation, wedlock status, past experience of live births, past experience of stillbirths, maternal nationality, and maternal age group were adjusted in the analysis of the two fetal mortality outcomes, and sex was also adjusted in the analysis of the three live birth outcomes. These explanatory variables (sex, household occupation, wedlock status, past experience of live births, past experience of stillbirths, maternal nationality, and maternal age group) were chosen because they have been shown to be linked to adverse birth outcomes in Japan [ 36 , 37 ]. Furthermore, birth month was included because adverse birth outcomes exhibit seasonality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the analysis, the time point variable, birth month (January, …, December), household occupation, wedlock status, past experience of live births, past experience of stillbirths, maternal nationality, and maternal age group were adjusted in the analysis of the two fetal mortality outcomes, and sex was also adjusted in the analysis of the three live birth outcomes. These explanatory variables (sex, household occupation, wedlock status, past experience of live births, past experience of stillbirths, maternal nationality, and maternal age group) were chosen because they have been shown to be linked to adverse birth outcomes in Japan [ 36 , 37 ]. Furthermore, birth month was included because adverse birth outcomes exhibit seasonality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%