2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difference solutions for responses of foundation-beams with arbitrary boundary conditions considering spatial soil variability and its applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of tunnel deflection and bending moment is shown in Figure5. The P-T model aligns well with the finite difference decomposition of the V-T model as proposed in reference[12], in terms of both numerical values and trends. However, the W-T model does not account for continuity between the soil layers,…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A comparison of tunnel deflection and bending moment is shown in Figure5. The P-T model aligns well with the finite difference decomposition of the V-T model as proposed in reference[12], in terms of both numerical values and trends. However, the W-T model does not account for continuity between the soil layers,…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…5. Comparison of results obtained by semi-analytical solution and the finite difference method: a) deflection diagram; b) bending moment diagram.The semi-analytical solution presented in this study suggests that when beam section A is constant and the Timoshenko beam consists of a homogeneous material, it degenerates to the computational case outlined in the reference[12]. Similarly, the P-T model degenerates to the W-T model when the shear modulus of the Pasternak foundation layer is zero.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results showed that the Euler-Bernoulli model underestimates deformation but overestimates internal forces of tunnels. Wang et al 16 derived a difference solution under arbitrary distributed loads, by simplifying the tunnel as a Timoshenko beam model. This model took the spatial soil variability and arbitrary elastic boundary conditions into consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%