Differences and similarities between Indigenous and conventional marine conservation planning: The case of the Songhees Nation, Canada

Buscher, Elena; Mathews, Darcy; Bryce, Cheryl; Bryce, Kathleen; Joseph, Darlene; Ban, Natalie C.

doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104520

Cited by 14 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 79 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The following figure is a visualization of VOSViewer based in co-authorship. One of the studies carried out by co-authors within the cluster is the study on conservation planning by Buscher et al (2021). This study describes conservation planning for indigenous and traditional communities.…”

Section: Analysis Of Co-authorship In Indigenous Community Governance...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…SCP covers only one zone, other stakeholders are not involved, and the entire socio-ecological system he tries to consider in one process step. This study provides insight into the need for indigenous communities around the world to implement their own marine conservation plans [18].…”

Section: Analysis Of Co-authorship In Indigenous Community Governance...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Different colours in each cluster indicate that the authors collaborated with each other in the research, either as first author or co-author. The first cluster marked by a red node contains 5 authors, namely Bryce, C., Bryce, K., Buscher, E., Joseph, D., and Mathews, D.L.One of the studies carried out by co-authors within the cluster is the study on conservation planning byBuscher et al (2021). This study describes conservation planning for indigenous and traditional communities.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Indigenous community governance in marine conservation: A bibliometric analysis

Sejati,

Sudarmo,

Haryanti

2024

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Maintaining marine sustainability and biodiversity requires support and cooperation from the government, stakeholders, and community. Indigenous communities have the right to restoration and protection of the environment and productive capacity of land, territory, sea, and all their natural resources. Research on community governance has been carried out by many researchers with increasingly developing topics. Including topics about indigenous peoples and natural resource conservation. This research aims is to determine the development of research trends regarding community governance of indigenous communities in marine conservation. The data source is literature in the Scopus database and the data analysis uses bibliometric analysis of indigenous community governance in marine conservation publications. The results are the research of indigenous communities governance in marine conservation from the first publication in 2006 has tended to increase. Although in certain years it has decreased or there have been no publications at all. The research become an interesting topic because it related with environmental science and indigenous communities have a big role in implementing marine conservation. This conservation has been going for a long time and passed down from generation to generation. The recommendation of this research is legal recognition for indigenous peoples to protect their rights.

show abstract

Section: Analysis Of Co-authorship In Indigenous Community Governance...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Analysis Of Co-authorship In Indigenous Community Governance...mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Indigenous community governance in marine conservation: A bibliometric analysis

Sejati,

Sudarmo,

Haryanti

2024

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The utility of ROVs is widely recognised in a range of scenarios, including marine science, exploration, and construction (Zereik et al, 2018). Adaptation of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology to ROVs has led to a large increase in the range of affordable models that are small, mobile, and relatively easy to operate, thereby increasing their availability to consumers and researchers (Buscher et al, 2020). ROVs are now routinely used for biodiversity surveys (Lam et al, 2006;Pacunski et al, 2008;Andaloro et al, 2013;Boavida et al, 2016), including the use of incidental imagery captured during non-scientific operations (Macreadie et al, 2018;McLean et al, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards remote surveillance of marine pests: A comparison between remote operated vehicles and diver surveys

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Early detection of marine invasive species is key for mitigating and managing their impacts to marine ecosystems and industries. Human divers are considered the gold standard tool for detecting marine invasive species, especially when dive teams are familiar with the local biodiversity. However, diver operations can be expensive and dangerous, and are not always practical. Remote operated vehicles (ROVs) can potentially overcome these limitations, but it is unclear how sensitive they are compared to trained divers for detecting pests. We assessed the sensitivity and efficiency of ROVs and divers for detecting marine non-indigenous species (NIS), including the potential for automated detection algorithms to reduce post-processing costs of ROV methods. We show that ROVs can detect comparable assemblages of invasive species as divers, but with lower detection rates (0.2 NIS min-1) than divers (0.5 NIS min-1) and covered less seafloor than divers per unit time. While small invertebrates (e.g., skeleton shrimp Caprella mutica) were more easily detected by divers, the invasive goby Acentrogobius pflaumii was only detected by the ROV. We show that implementation of computer vision algorithms can provide accurate identification of larger biofouling organisms and reduce overall survey costs, yet the relative costs of ROV surveys remain almost twice that of diver surveys. We expect that as ROV technologies improve and investment in autonomous and semi-autonomous underwater vehicles increases, much of the current inefficiencies of ROVs will be mitigated, yet practitioners should be aware of limitations in taxonomic resolution and the strengths of specialist diver teams.

show abstract

“…By committing to the Aichi Targets in the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Canada agreed to not only conserve (Target 11), but to also focus on protecting those that provide essential services and contribute to health, livelihoods, and well-being of Indigenous peoples (Target 14) and to include the full and effective participation of Indigenous peoples and local communities at all relevant levels (Target 18) (CBD 2020). Expansion of the Canadian Marine Conservation Network with the 2025 and 2030 targets then represents an opportunity to further link conservation with strong, healthy communities through nation-to-nation partnerships that would shape marine protection in support of an Indigenous vision of a working landscape, ushering in a broader more inclusive set of ecological and social benefits to marine conservation (Simon 2017;Zurba et al 2019;Buscher et al 2021). This builds on the growing representation of ocean conservation areas in Canada and abroad that are established and managed through the leadership of Indigenous rights holders (e.g., National Indigenous Guardians Network) (Tran et al, 2020;Government of Canada 2021b;Indigenous Leadership Initiative n.d.) as the momentum for Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas builds in parallel to international recognition of Indigenous rights through the adoption of the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) (UN General Assembly 2007).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A climate-resilient marine conservation network for Canada

Bryndum-Buchholz

Boerder

Stanley

et al. 2022

FACETS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Climate change and biodiversity loss are twin crises that are driving global marine conservation efforts. However, if unaccounted for, climate change can undermine the efficacy of such efforts. Despite this, integration of climate change adaptation and resilience into spatial marine conservation and management has been limited in Canada and elsewhere. With climate change impacts becoming increasingly severe, now is the time to anticipate and reduce impacts wherever possible. We provide five recommendations for an inclusive, proactive, climate-ready approach for Canada’s growing marine conservation network: (1) integrating climate-resilience as a universal objective of the Canadian Marine Conservation Network, creating and implementing (2) national transdisciplinary working groups with representation from all knowledge holders and (3) necessary tools that integrate climate change into conservation design, (4) defining operational and climate-relevant monitoring and management objectives, and (5) strengthening communication and increasing knowledge exchange around the roles and benefits of protected areas within government and towards the public. Canada’s extensive marine and coastal areas reflect national and international responsibility to engage on this issue. Canada is well positioned to assume a leading role in climate change adaptation for marine conservation and help accelerate progress towards international commitments around mitigating ongoing biodiversity loss and climate change.

show abstract

Differences and similarities between Indigenous and conventional marine conservation planning: The case of the Songhees Nation, Canada

Cited by 14 publications

References 79 publications

Indigenous community governance in marine conservation: A bibliometric analysis

Indigenous community governance in marine conservation: A bibliometric analysis

Towards remote surveillance of marine pests: A comparison between remote operated vehicles and diver surveys

A climate-resilient marine conservation network for Canada

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About