2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05855-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between bisphosphonate-related and denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Querrer et al (2021) [57] An increase in bone sequestra, cortical bone lysis, and bone density was observed in bisphosphonate-related ONJ, while larger bone sequestra, more frequent periosteal reactions, and mandibular canal enhancement were noted in denosumab-related ONJ.…”
Section: Non-interventional Reviews Author Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Querrer et al (2021) [57] An increase in bone sequestra, cortical bone lysis, and bone density was observed in bisphosphonate-related ONJ, while larger bone sequestra, more frequent periosteal reactions, and mandibular canal enhancement were noted in denosumab-related ONJ.…”
Section: Non-interventional Reviews Author Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quando os osteoclastos aderem à superfície óssea para iniciar a reabsorção, liberam enzimas que acidificam o ambiente e promovem a degradação óssea. Estes degradados ricos em BFs são fagocitados pelos osteoclastos inibindo a reabsorção óssea pela inativação da via da síntese do colesterol dentro da célula, reduz a atividade celular ou promove a apoptose, interrompendo assim, o ciclo dos osteoclastos (Querrer et al, 2021;Papapoulos, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…As características imagenológicas podem diferir a depender da droga empregada (Querrer et al, 2021) e do grau de compromentimento clínico (Kim et al,2020). O acompanhamento imagenológico é recomendado (Moreno-Rabié, et al, 2020) desde antes do início terapêutico, sendo possível observar espessamento da lâmina dura (Cardoso et al,2017), osteoesclerose (Arce et al, 2009), falha da remodelação óssea (Moinzadeh et al, 2013), aumento do espaço do ligamento periodontal e da densidade trabecular, cicatrização deficiente de alvéolos pós-extração, formação de sequestros ósseos, alargamento do canal mandibular e/ou do assoalho do seio maxilar, fistulas oroantrais, fístulas oronasais (Wasserzug et al, 2017) e neoformação óssea periosteal (Brozoski et al, 2012;Fliefel et al, 2015).…”
unclassified
“…Early signs of disease are maxillary or mandibular sites (mainly post-extractive, but also perimplant site or associated to endodontic sequelae) with delayed healing and persistent mucosal incompetence, following by superinfection and bone sequestrum. ( Figure 15 a,b) [ 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 ], Lesions may be single or multiple, synchronous or metachronous necrotic areas of the jaw, with pus drainage and with or without bone exposure. Overall, any dental procedure may represent a risk factor for MRONJ in patients taking the aforementioned drugs [ 134 ].…”
Section: Drug-induced Oral Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%