2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between charged-current coefficient functions

Abstract: Second-and third-order results are presented for the structure functions of charged-current deepinelastic scattering in the framework of massless perturbative QCD. We write down the two-loop differences between the corresponding crossing-even and -odd coefficient functions, including those for the longitudinal structure function not covered in the literature so far. At three loops we compute the lowest five moments of these differences for all three structure functions and provide approximate expressions in Bj… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(84 reference statements)
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1,2,8,9] at hand we have all ingredients for a future computation of the "all-n" results in Mellin-n space, or equivalently the complete expression in Bjorken-x space after an inverse Mellin transform. However, applying the present results we can already comment on a number of phenomenological issues, which we do in a companion paper [21].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1,2,8,9] at hand we have all ingredients for a future computation of the "all-n" results in Mellin-n space, or equivalently the complete expression in Bjorken-x space after an inverse Mellin transform. However, applying the present results we can already comment on a number of phenomenological issues, which we do in a companion paper [21].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…[21]. Future research will be devoted to the calculation of some higher Mellin moments, potentially n = 11, .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2.7) in Ref. [45]. Also that equation for δc (2) 3 ≡ c (2) 3,+ − c (2) 3,− contains terms up to ln 3 x, hence c (2) 3,− and c (2) 3,+ already differ in the leading logarithm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The above (spin-averaged) splitting functions are presently known to n = 2 [1,2], i.e., the nextto-next-to-leading order (NNLO ≡ N 2 LO). The coefficient functions for the most important structure functions (including F 3 for charge-averaged W -exchange) have also been fully computed to order α 3 s [3][4][5], while the less important chargeasymmetry W -cases are available only through a couple of low-integer Mellin-N moments [6,7]. The frontier in the present massless case are now the α 4 s corrections, for which first results have been obtained at the lowest value of N [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%