Differences between encoding and retrieval failure in mild cognitive impairment: results from quantitative electroencephalography and magnetic resonance volumetry

Abstract

Background: The memory impairments in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) can be classified into encoding (EF) and retrieval (RF) failure, which can be affected by underlying pathomechanism. We explored the differences structurally and functionally.Methods: We compared quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) power spectra and connectivity between 87 MCI patients with EF and 78 MCI with RF using iSyncBrain ™ (iMediSync, Inc., Korea) (https://isyncbrain.com/). Voxel-based morphometric analysis of the gray matter (GM) in the MCI groups and 71 cognitive normal controls were also done using the Computational Anatomy Toolbox 12 (http://www.neuro.uni-jena.de/cat/).Results: qEEG showed higher frontal theta and lower beta2 band power and higher theta and lower beta connectivity in the EF. There was no statistically significant difference in GM volume between the EF and RF. However, when compared to normal control, GM volume reductions due to EF in the left thalamus and bilateral hippocampi and reductions due to RF in the left thalamus, right superior frontal lobe, right superior temporal lobe, and right middle cingulum were observed ( p < 0.05, family-wise error correction). Conclusions: MCI differs functionally and structurally according to their specific memory impairments. The EF findings are structurally and functionally more consistent with the prodromal Alzheimer's disease stage than the RF findings. Since this study is a cross-sectional study, prospective follow-up studies are needed to investigate whether different types of memory impairments can predict the underlying pathology of amnestic MCI. Additionally, insufficient sample size may lead to ambiguous statistical findings in direct comparisons, a larger patient cohort could more robustly identify differences in GM volume reductions between the EF and the RF group.

Fatigue in Parkinson’s Disease Is Due to Decreased Efficiency of the Frontal Network: Quantitative EEG Analysis

“…QEEG processing and group analyses were conducted using iSyncBrain® (iMediSync Inc., Republic of Korea), a cloud-based, artificial intelligence EEG analysis platform (https://isyncbrain.com/) 8 . EEG preprocessing was performed to denoise all data and minimize the effects of artifacts.…”

Algorithm-defined memory impairment in older American Indians: The Strong Heart Study.

“…All remaining participants, namely those with adequate or good performance on the learning trials, SDFR, and LDFR tasks, were coded as having intact memory. Although these categories are not specific to any pathology and may not be mutually exclusive, memory impairment characteristic of amnestic Alzheimer's disease tends to follow an encoding or storage pattern, often a result of damage to the hippocampus, whereas memory problems associated with vascular brain injury tend to follow a retrieval pattern, via damage to the frontal and subcortical structures (Han et al, 2021;Traykov et al, 2002Traykov et al, , 2005.…”

Remote memory engrams are controlled by encoding-specific tau phosphorylation

“…Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common form of dementia, is characterised by progressive cognitive decline and loss of existing memory 8 . Episodic memory deficits occur early in AD and are thought to occur due to ineffective encoding 9,10 and impaired memory retrieval 9 . The engram refers to the physical unit of cognitive information storage in nervous systems [1][2][3][4] .…”