2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between Euler-Bernoulli and Timoshenko beam formulations for calculating the effects of moving loads on a periodically supported beam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Timoshenko beam formulation include shear deformation and rotational inertia of the rail, which is considered more reliable. 21,22 To improve the calculation efficiency, The effective analysis frequency was set to 2.5 kHz for this simulation, which is sufficient to fully reflect the natural frequencies of the rails in turnouts excited by wheel-rail impacts. 23 The centroid of the rail sections is taken as the node of the beam elements, which in turn is used to connect with the joint, constraint, and force elements in the SIMPACK software.…”
Section: Turnout Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Timoshenko beam formulation include shear deformation and rotational inertia of the rail, which is considered more reliable. 21,22 To improve the calculation efficiency, The effective analysis frequency was set to 2.5 kHz for this simulation, which is sufficient to fully reflect the natural frequencies of the rails in turnouts excited by wheel-rail impacts. 23 The centroid of the rail sections is taken as the node of the beam elements, which in turn is used to connect with the joint, constraint, and force elements in the SIMPACK software.…”
Section: Turnout Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the low to medium frequency content considered in this work, it is sufficient to model the rail with the Euler-Bernoulli beam. 5,44 In the beam, each node at the sleeper is connected to the ground using a single spring-damper assembly, representing the net stiffness and damping of the track bed below the rail (rail-pads, ballast, sub-ballast and subgrade). Although pads and granular materials present a nonlinear material behaviour, 6,42,45 this effect is not considered in this work for simplicity.…”
Section: Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salcher et al developed a stochastic process with Monte Carlo simulations to solve the response of the railway bridge in terms of deflection and acceleration [16]. Other researchers proposed hybrid models by combining the simulation of wheel-rail contact force with periodic loss of contact due to track irregularities [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%