1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(96)01637-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between Monte Carlo models for DIS at small-x and the relation to BFKL dynamics

Abstract: The differences between two standard Monte Carlo models, Lepto and Ariadne, for deep inelastic scattering at small-x is analysed in detail. It is shown that the difference arises from a 'unorthodox' suppression factor used in Ariadne which replaces the normal ratio of parton densities. This gives rise to a factor that qualitatively is similar to what one would expect from BFKL dynamics for some observables like the energy flow and forward jets but not for the 2+1 jet cross-section. It is also discussed how one… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[240]), where Ariadne gives a much higher-jet rate than conventional cascades, in better agreement with data. Comparing the Sudakov form factors one can see that the dipole shower in Ariadne resums some large logarithms of 1/x, similarly to what is done in BFKL evolution [241].…”
Section: Hadronic Collisionssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…[240]), where Ariadne gives a much higher-jet rate than conventional cascades, in better agreement with data. Comparing the Sudakov form factors one can see that the dipole shower in Ariadne resums some large logarithms of 1/x, similarly to what is done in BFKL evolution [241].…”
Section: Hadronic Collisionssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…[235]), where Ariadne gives a much higher jet rate than conventional cascades, in better agreement with data. Comparing the Sudakov form factors one can see that the dipole shower in Ariadne resums some large logarithms of 1/x, similarly to what is done in BFKL evolution [236].…”
Section: Hadronic Collisionssupporting
confidence: 57%