1989
DOI: 10.1016/0165-5728(89)90178-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between ocular and generalized myasthenia gravis: binding characteristics of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody against bovine muscles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implication is that the antibody binds to a different part of the receptor in the two different processes. A related finding in some studies, 17,27,28 but not all 29 is that patients with ocular myasthenia, including some with negative antibody titres in traditional assays using limb muscle, 28 have sera that react more strongly in assays using antigen derived from ocular muscles, whereas the opposite is true for patients with generalized myasthenia. 17 Physiological hypotheses cite differences in the structure and function of extra-ocular muscles.…”
Section: Immunological Reasonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implication is that the antibody binds to a different part of the receptor in the two different processes. A related finding in some studies, 17,27,28 but not all 29 is that patients with ocular myasthenia, including some with negative antibody titres in traditional assays using limb muscle, 28 have sera that react more strongly in assays using antigen derived from ocular muscles, whereas the opposite is true for patients with generalized myasthenia. 17 Physiological hypotheses cite differences in the structure and function of extra-ocular muscles.…”
Section: Immunological Reasonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Fluctuation, " the hallmark of the disease and its clinical signs, often impedes the diagnostic process. Moreover, serologic antibody testing, as well as repetitive nerve stimulation of peripheral muscles is reported to be less sensitive in OMG as compared to generalized myasthenia gravis (MG), with sensitivity rates of approximately 50% vs. up to 90% (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Edrophonium testing may cause fatal adverse events and is often unavailable outside specialized institutions.…”
Section: Ocular Myasthenia Gravis -A Diagnostic Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sera that only reacted with en grappe endplates presumably were binding the fetal AChR. When bovine EOM and foot muscles are used as a source of antigen, no difference in antibody detection is evident; 43 however, the interspecies differences between the human and bovine AChR likely mask the significance of the type of muscle used for antigen preparation.…”
Section: Immunological Reaction Of Myasthenia Gravis To Extraocular Mmentioning
confidence: 99%