2004
DOI: 10.1159/000076143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between Regressive Eyes and Non-Regressive Eyes after LASIK for Myopia in the Time Course of Corneal Changes Assessed with the Orbscan

Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare regressive eyes with non-regressive eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia with regard to the time course of biomechanical changes of the cornea and to evaluate the possible roles of these changes in refractive regression following surgery. 15 eyes of 9 patients with refractive regression and 15 eyes of 11 patients with no refractive regression after LASIK for myopia were enrolled in this study. The time courses of central corneal thickness (CCT) and ant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115] A notable exception is a study comparing Orbscan topography to the EyeSys system, which suggests that Orbscan curvature topography may be as accurate and precise as the Placido-based EyeSys system. 106 Comparison of Orbscan pachymetry with US techniques continues to provide data that reveal similar or slightly thinner measurements when derived from normal corneas yet significantly underestimates when measuring post-LASIK corneal thickness (0.92 acoustic factor adjustment included).…”
Section: Post Scriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115] A notable exception is a study comparing Orbscan topography to the EyeSys system, which suggests that Orbscan curvature topography may be as accurate and precise as the Placido-based EyeSys system. 106 Comparison of Orbscan pachymetry with US techniques continues to provide data that reveal similar or slightly thinner measurements when derived from normal corneas yet significantly underestimates when measuring post-LASIK corneal thickness (0.92 acoustic factor adjustment included).…”
Section: Post Scriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…106 Comparison of Orbscan pachymetry with US techniques continues to provide data that reveal similar or slightly thinner measurements when derived from normal corneas yet significantly underestimates when measuring post-LASIK corneal thickness (0.92 acoustic factor adjustment included). [107][108][109][110] Further evidence of Orbscan-defined ectasia following laser refractive surgery has been reported, 111 in sharp contrast to a novel study suggesting that alterations in the magnification of the posterior surface before and after laser refractive surgery may produce artifactual ectasia. 112 Studies of Orbscan assessment of total corneal optical power in normal and surgically altered corneas show close agreements and improved repeatability in manifest refraction.…”
Section: Post Scriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most previous studies agree that myopic regression after LASIK is attributable to epithelial hyperplasia and stromal remodeling. [10,11] Pan et al [12] compared regressive eyes with nonregressive eyes after LASIK and indicated that refractive regression after LASIK might be mainly induced by corneal protrusion rather than by CCT. Our study also demonstrated that there were no significant changes in CCT in each of the 2 groups (Table 2 and Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But Magallanes et al [11] reported a significant myopic shift with only a slight increase in CCT, but a slight myopic shift with a significant increase in CCT after LASIK. Pan et al [12] compared regressive eyes with nonregressive eyes after LASIK and indicated that refractive regression after LASIK might be mainly induced by corneal protrusion rather than by central corneal thickening. Till now, the mechanism of refractive regression after LASIK is not fully elucidated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%