1958
DOI: 10.1177/002383095800100303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences Between the Child and the Aphasic

Abstract: Comparison between children and aphasics shows more differences than similarities in their language and behaviour. Just as atrophy in plants or animals may bear false resemblances to normal stages of growth, so the pathology of aphasia is not to be understood in the same terms as child development.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, individuals with aphasia should produce more errors on those structures that are acquired late by children and that are less frequent within and between languages. This hypothesis was dismissed early on as a general explanation for aphasia (e.g., Albright, 1958;Caramazza, 1994). It has been noted that aphasic errors do not systematically affect some (more complex) structures compared to others.…”
Section: Nature Of Complexity Effects and Aphasic Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, individuals with aphasia should produce more errors on those structures that are acquired late by children and that are less frequent within and between languages. This hypothesis was dismissed early on as a general explanation for aphasia (e.g., Albright, 1958;Caramazza, 1994). It has been noted that aphasic errors do not systematically affect some (more complex) structures compared to others.…”
Section: Nature Of Complexity Effects and Aphasic Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%