2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between the efficacy of HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) in breast cancer during dual-target neoadjuvant therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in the same subtype, most baseline features could not distinguish treatment outcomes, and their importance was very limited in the model. Only for the HER2 positive subtype, previous studies showed that different HER2 expressions showed signi cantly different pCR rates [27][28]. This also explains why the clinical model has better performance than the radiomics model in the HER2 positive subtype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, in the same subtype, most baseline features could not distinguish treatment outcomes, and their importance was very limited in the model. Only for the HER2 positive subtype, previous studies showed that different HER2 expressions showed signi cantly different pCR rates [27][28]. This also explains why the clinical model has better performance than the radiomics model in the HER2 positive subtype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, in the same subtype, most baseline features could not distinguish treatment outcomes, and their importance was very limited in the model. Only for the HER2 positive subtype, previous studies showed that different HER2 expressions showed significantly different pCR rates [ 28 , 29 ]. This also explains why the clinical model has better performance than the radiomics model in the HER2 positive subtype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%