1956
DOI: 10.1038/177576a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between the Electrical Charge carried by Normal and Homologous Tumour Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
1

Year Published

1957
1957
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Transformed and highly oncogenic cells have often been found to have a higher surface net negative charge than their non-transformed or normal counterparts [9]. In order to determine whether BrdUrd treatment altered net surface charge the electrophoretic mobility of BrdUrd, TdR, or non-treated cells was determined by observing the electrophoretic mobility of cells in an electric field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transformed and highly oncogenic cells have often been found to have a higher surface net negative charge than their non-transformed or normal counterparts [9]. In order to determine whether BrdUrd treatment altered net surface charge the electrophoretic mobility of BrdUrd, TdR, or non-treated cells was determined by observing the electrophoretic mobility of cells in an electric field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Dunham, Nichols and Brunschwig, 1946;de Long, Coman, an. Zeidman, 1950), decreased adherence (McCutcheon, Coman and, Moore, 1948), absence of contact inhibition (Abercrombie andHeaysman, 1953, 1954) and accelerated electrophoretic mobility (Ambrose, James and Lowick, 1956) have all been demonstrated. However the fundamental change underlying these has not yet been elucidated, and it remains to be shown whether any or all of them run parallel to the apparent changes in antigen-content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Malignant cells are often more negatively charged than normal cells (Ambrose, James and Lowick, 1956). Assuming that this difference in charge might be useful for in vivo therapy, we have given either polycation or polyanion (a) to AKR mice which have a high incidence of spontaneous thymus lymphatic leukaemia (Dunn, 1954) and (b) to BALB/c mice infected with Rauscher leukaemia virus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%