2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10934-009-9268-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between the isostructural IRMOF-1 and MOCP-L porous adsorbents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining potential catalytic centers in MOF-5 will be Zn-OH groups and coordinatively unsaturated Zn 2+ sites, which may come from partial hydrolysis of the framework or from the inclusion of ZnO particles during the synthesis of the MOF. As we have already mentioned above, the amount of ZnO (or Zn(OH)2) impurities present in the MOF sample will depend on the synthesis procedure [14,15]. Thus, when MOF-5 samples are prepared with the fast precipitation method with triethylamine reported by Huang et al [3], the ZnO content of the resulting MOF-5 is not negligible.…”
Section: Catalytic Activity Of Mof-5mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The remaining potential catalytic centers in MOF-5 will be Zn-OH groups and coordinatively unsaturated Zn 2+ sites, which may come from partial hydrolysis of the framework or from the inclusion of ZnO particles during the synthesis of the MOF. As we have already mentioned above, the amount of ZnO (or Zn(OH)2) impurities present in the MOF sample will depend on the synthesis procedure [14,15]. Thus, when MOF-5 samples are prepared with the fast precipitation method with triethylamine reported by Huang et al [3], the ZnO content of the resulting MOF-5 is not negligible.…”
Section: Catalytic Activity Of Mof-5mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We have also considered that the MOF sample contained ZnO nanoparticles of about 15-20 nm in diameter, as suggested by Calleja et al [15]. Due to the larger particle size of the commercial ZnO sample, this has a surface-to-volume ratio which is about 6 times lower than in the ZnO nanoparticles in MOF-5, as calculated by simple geometric considerations and assuming spherical particles in both cases.…”
Section: Catalytic Activity Of Mof-5mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is primarily because the purity of the MOF-5 framework is highly dependent on the synthesis route, where reduced surface areas are often reported arising from either framework interpenetration or the incorporation of organic and/or zinc species within the pore system. [99,100] The latter issue is particularly significant since these species have the potential to manifest semiconductor-like behaviours in photoluminescence spectra which could then be attributed (rightly or wrongly) to energy or charge transfer processes in the framework itself.…”
Section: Oxide-based Qd@mof Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then tested Co(nim) 2 for Knoevenagel reaction with an initial conversion of over 90% obtained for both solvent free and solvent condition that took 20 and 30 min, respectively, and there was no observed loss of intrinsic catalytic activity after reusability test as shown in Figure 13. Consequently, the slight lower conversion obtained with Co(nim) 2 could be attributed to the base weakening influence of the nitro group on the imidazolate linker, however, Co(im) 2 0.5 DMA is more basic with a corresponding higher conversion and shorter reaction time activate the carbonyl substrates of the Knoevenagel condensation acting as catalyst or co-catalyst for the reaction (Gascon et al, 2009;Llabrés et al, 2012); markedly, the extra frameworks of CoO (impurities entrapped inside the pore cavities as either nanoparticles or segregated crystallites) also contribute to the catalytic activities of CO-ZIFs (Llabrés et al, 2012;Hafizovic et al, 2007;Calleja et al, 2010;Neogi et al, 2009).…”
Section: Knoevenagel Condensationmentioning
confidence: 99%