Differences between Treadmill and Cycle Ergometer Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Results in Triathletes and Their Association with Body Composition and Body Mass Index

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the method of choice to assess aerobic fitness. Previous research was ambiguous as to whether treadmill (TE) and cycle ergometry (CE) results are transferrable or different between testing modalities in triathletes. The aim of this paper was to investigate the differences in HR and VO2 at maximum exertion between TE and CE, at anaerobic threshold (AT) and respiratory compensation point (RCP) and evaluate their association with body fat (BF), fat-free mass (FFM) and body mass index (BMI). In total, 143 adult (n = 18 female), Caucasian triathletes had both Tr and CE CPET performed. The male group was divided into <40 years (n = 80) and >40 years (n = 45). Females were aged between 18 and 46 years. Body composition was measured with bioelectrical impedance before tests. Differences were evaluated using paired t-tests, and associations were evaluated in males using multiple linear regression (MLR). Significant differences were found in VO2 and HR at maximum exertion, at AT and at RCP between CE and TE testing, in both males and females. VO2AT was 38.8 (±4.6) mL/kg/min in TE vs. 32.8 (±5.4) in CE in males and 36.0 (±3.6) vs. 32.1 (±3.8) in females (p < 0.001). HRAT was 149 (±10) bpm in TE vs. 136 (±11) in CE in males and 156 (±7) vs. 146 (±11) in females (p < 0.001). VO2max was 52 (±6) mL/kg/min vs. 49 (±7) in CE in males and 45.3 (±4.9) in Tr vs. 43.9 (±5.2) in females (p < 0.001). HRmax was 183 (±10) bpm in TE vs. 177 (±10) in CE in males and 183 (±9) vs. 179 (±10) in females (p < 0.001). MLR showed that BMI, BF and FFM are significantly associated with differences in HR and VO2 at maximum, AT and RCP in males aged >40. Both tests should be used independently to achieve optimal fitness assessments and further training planning.

COVID-19 and athletes: Endurance sport and activity resilience study—CAESAR study

“…Our results demonstrate the cumulative negative effect of the pandemic on physical fitness among endurance athletes and show different infection consequences for both treadmill and cycle ergometry. These findings are in line with the previous research, as Price et al confirmed that both modalities differed (Price et al, 2022), the choice of device was adapted to the leading discipline of the subject, differences may have occurred in VO 2 and HR at maximum exertion, at AT and at RCP between cycling and running CPET testing, in both males and females. In our participants, we found lower VO 2max and earlier lactate accumulation during CPET.…”

The Influence of Nutrition and Physical Activity on Exercise Performance after Mild COVID-19 Infection in Endurance Athletes-CESAR Study

“…Each athlete underwent CPET on the same modality pre-and post-COVID-19 infection because each modality was previously linked with different performance results [25]. During the post-COVID-19 CPET, athletes received a questionnaire covering selected areas of general health assessment.…”

Impact of COVID-19 Infection on Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Sleep, and Psychology of Endurance Athletes– CAESAR Study

“…The mental health of patients 12 months after the disease presents symptoms of mental disorders, lack of concentration and focus, increasing with the severity of the infection [16]. Significant improvement was noted 2 years after infection, which is reassuring, but it should be remembered that undergoing COVID-19 infection consequences for mental health can influence future health state of the EA [17]. It was tested that the course of mental disorders related to COVID-19 depends on age and sex [18,19].…”