2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between TripAdvisor and Booking.com in branding co-creation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The EM and SOM clustering approaches were used to cluster the TripAdvisor data. Borges-Tiago et al (2021) investigated the differences between Booking.com and TripAdvisor.com in branding co-creation. They found that similar brand personality traits were presented by the users in non-commercial and commercial platforms.…”
Section: Previous Literature Of Online Customers’ Reviews and Ratingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EM and SOM clustering approaches were used to cluster the TripAdvisor data. Borges-Tiago et al (2021) investigated the differences between Booking.com and TripAdvisor.com in branding co-creation. They found that similar brand personality traits were presented by the users in non-commercial and commercial platforms.…”
Section: Previous Literature Of Online Customers’ Reviews and Ratingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second stage is withdrawing 700 random reviews from booking.com; the reason behind choosing this website is that it is considered one of the most popular online travel platforms globally (Mellinas and Martin-Fuentes, 2021). It provides an extensive database collecting millions of reviews worldwide accommodations and holidays that academics and tourism destination managers have widely depend on enhancing their services through the past decade (Borges-Tiago et al, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the research focused on the importance and ways of achieving trust on review sites with an emphasis on creating a conceptual model of trust for review sites. When choosing review sites for both case studies, opinions on their selection among the most important review sites were respected (Xiang et al 2017;Borges-Tiago et al 2021). An important selection criterion was their sophisticated approach to eliminating false and misleading reviews.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%