2019
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in antinociceptive signalling mechanisms following morphine and fentanyl microinjections into the rat periaqueductal gray

Abstract: Background Morphine and fentanyl are two of the most commonly used opioids to treat pain. Although both opioids produce antinociception by binding to mu‐opioid receptors (MOR), they appear to act via distinct signalling pathways. Objective This study will reveal whether differences in morphine and fentanyl antinociception are the result of selective activation of G‐protein signalling and/or selective activation of pre‐ or postsynaptic MORs. Methods The contribution of each mechanism to morphine and fentanyl an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study shows that fentanyl is a more effective antinociceptive opioid than morphine. This nding is consistent with a previous study that revealed different mechanisms for the antinociception of morphine and fentanyl (Morgan et al 2020). Furthermore, it could be explained by the suggestion that some opioids could be acting through other mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The study shows that fentanyl is a more effective antinociceptive opioid than morphine. This nding is consistent with a previous study that revealed different mechanisms for the antinociception of morphine and fentanyl (Morgan et al 2020). Furthermore, it could be explained by the suggestion that some opioids could be acting through other mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Since sub-maximal concentrations were used for each of the agonists, the lack of increase with fentanyl in the recordings from RGS-insensitive Het mice was not attributed to a ceiling effect. These data are consistent with recent data showing that inhibition of RGS4 in the PAG enhanced morphine, but not fentanyl, antinociception (Morgan, Tran, Wescom, & Bobeck, 2020). There is evidence that RGS protein GTPase accelerating activity is more evident with low compared to high efficacy MOR agonists (Clark, et al, 2008); however, the maximal inhibition by all agonists was comparable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although it is tempting to argue that postsynaptic MORs in the vlPAG do not play a role in opioid-induced antinociception, an equally valid interpretation is that MOR coupling to GIRK channels opposes supraspinal antinociceptive circuits and removal of this MOR signaling supports opioid analgesia in the RGS-insensitive Het mice (Lamberts, et al, 2013). Indeed, blocking both GIRK channels and presynaptic MOR signaling decreases morphine antinociception (Morgan, et al, 2020). Inhibition of RGS4 in the vlPAG enhances opioid-induced antinociception suggesting that RGS4 may play an important role in regulating presynaptic MOR signaling through Go.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to mention that pharmacological inhibition of RGS4 activity in certain brain regions may also modulate the antinociceptive actions of opioids. Recent studies have reported that microinjection of compound CCG-63802 in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG) enhances the antinociceptive potency of morphine but has no effect on fentanyl's actions in the same paradigm (Morgan et al 2020). While CCG-63802 is not a highly selective compound (Senese et al 2020), these data suggest an agonist-dependent role of RGS4 in the modulation of opioid actions in the PAG.…”
Section: Chronic Treatment With Either Mor or Delta Opioid Receptor (mentioning
confidence: 99%