1987
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.61.2.509-515.1987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in biological activity and structural protein VP1 phosphorylation of polyomavirus progeny resulting from infection of primary mouse kidney and primary mouse embryo cell cultures

Abstract: Both primary mouse kidney and primary mouse embryo cells in culture were used for polyomavirus progeny production. Examination of polyomavirus virion structural integrity revealed that mouse embryo cell progeny contained a threefold greater population of unstable particles when compared with mouse kidney cell progeny. Differences in biological activity between these two progeny virion types were also shown. Mouse kidney cell progeny compared with mouse embryo cell progeny exhibited a 10-fold greater ability to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Removal of the chelator and reducing agent together with addition of CaCl2 resulted in the assembly of these capsomeres into structures which resembled viral capsids. Besides further implicating a role for calcium in maintaining the structural integrity of the virus, these studies also suggested that the posttranslational modifications of VP1 which occur in eukaryotic cells (2,3,5,18,19,26,28,29,35) may not be necessary for proper capsid formation. These studies also indicated that the minor capsid proteins were not necessary for in vitro assembly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Removal of the chelator and reducing agent together with addition of CaCl2 resulted in the assembly of these capsomeres into structures which resembled viral capsids. Besides further implicating a role for calcium in maintaining the structural integrity of the virus, these studies also suggested that the posttranslational modifications of VP1 which occur in eukaryotic cells (2,3,5,18,19,26,28,29,35) may not be necessary for proper capsid formation. These studies also indicated that the minor capsid proteins were not necessary for in vitro assembly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, capsids (containing VP2 and VP3) are unable to inhibit infection by virions (7), suggesting that specific VP1 phosphorylation sites may play a role in cell recognition. This hypothesis is supported by the location of the identified phosphorylation sites in the virion structure and previous data suggesting that virions with distinct isoelectric focusing phosphorylation patterns generated by infection of different mouse cell types have different efficiencies of in vitro infectivity (25). Studies with the T-156 and T-63 mutant viruses concerning the properties of in vitro and in vivo infectivity are now in progress to determine the relationship of these functions to VPI phosphorylation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…late structural proteins), polyomavirus is able to expand its functional capabilities by utilizing post-translationally modified versions of its structural proteins (e.g., VP1) for various required functions (e.g., cellular attachment and hemagglutination) (2,3). It is important to note that the enzymes responsible for these modifications are a property of the host cell (25). Polyomavirus VP1 has been demonstrated to separate into six distinct species, A (most basic) through F (most acidic), based on their isoelectric points (3).…”
Section: S -mentioning
confidence: 99%