2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2020.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in cancer prevalence among CHEK2 carriers identified via multi-gene panel testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aloraifi and colleagues performed a meta-analysis of protein-truncating variants in moderate-risk breast cancer genes in 2015 and cited only 12 out of 54 published CHEK2 analyses (22%) that had performed full gene scanning [ 113 ]. Recently, a spectrum of CHEK2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants identified in 2508 carriers analyzed by GeneDx in the USA was published by Sutcliffe and colleagues [ 114 ]. They showed that nearly 95% of all carriers have some of the 18 variants detected more than 10 times, while the remaining approximately 5% of individuals carried one of the 101 rare germline variants including 17 large intragenic rearrangements.…”
Section: Germline Chek2 Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Aloraifi and colleagues performed a meta-analysis of protein-truncating variants in moderate-risk breast cancer genes in 2015 and cited only 12 out of 54 published CHEK2 analyses (22%) that had performed full gene scanning [ 113 ]. Recently, a spectrum of CHEK2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants identified in 2508 carriers analyzed by GeneDx in the USA was published by Sutcliffe and colleagues [ 114 ]. They showed that nearly 95% of all carriers have some of the 18 variants detected more than 10 times, while the remaining approximately 5% of individuals carried one of the 101 rare germline variants including 17 large intragenic rearrangements.…”
Section: Germline Chek2 Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A full gene analysis was largely introduced with NGS panels. However, the identification of copy number variations (CNV), which represent a substantial fraction of CHEK2 germline mutations (exon 9–10 deletions (denoted also 5395del) in Slavic populations [ 115 ] and US patients [ 114 ] and exons 2–3 and 6 in Greece [ 116 ]), is still not a golden standard. Besides, pseudogene sequences homologous to exons 10–14 limited analyses in early NGS studies [ 117 , 118 ].…”
Section: Germline Chek2 Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sutcliffe et al [ 37 ] analyzed different phenotypes of CHEK2 mutation associated with the occurrence of various malignancies. PVs in CHEK2 mutation were analyzed in 2508 patients (93% females; 83% Caucasians).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%