2019
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in carbon isotope leaf‐to‐phloem fractionation and mixing patterns along a vertical gradient in mature European beech and Douglas fir

Abstract: Summary While photosynthetic isotope discrimination is well understood, the postphotosynthetic and transport‐related fractionation mechanisms that influence phloem and subsequently tree ring δ13C are less investigated and may vary among species. We studied the seasonal and diel courses of leaf‐to‐phloem δ13C differences of water‐soluble organic matter (WSOM) in vertical crown gradients and followed the assimilate transport via the branches to the trunk phloem at breast height in European beech (Fagus sylvati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Isotopic changes in phloem contents could also arise from compound-specific isotopic signatures in the phloem. Such differences amongst compounds have been observed in phloem contents (Smith, Wild, Richter, Simonin, & Merchant, 2016;Offerman, Ferrio, Holst, Grote, Siegwolf, Kayler, & Gessler, 2011) and they were especially noteworthy in the polyols in Douglas-fir xylem sap (Bögelein, Lehmann, & Thomas, 2019), which represented 37% of the phloem solutes and were approximately 2‰ more depleted than sucrose. It is not clear where the heavy carbon would go at polyol synthesis, but one might expect that it is retained in the substrates.…”
Section: Phloem Contents and Isotopic Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Isotopic changes in phloem contents could also arise from compound-specific isotopic signatures in the phloem. Such differences amongst compounds have been observed in phloem contents (Smith, Wild, Richter, Simonin, & Merchant, 2016;Offerman, Ferrio, Holst, Grote, Siegwolf, Kayler, & Gessler, 2011) and they were especially noteworthy in the polyols in Douglas-fir xylem sap (Bögelein, Lehmann, & Thomas, 2019), which represented 37% of the phloem solutes and were approximately 2‰ more depleted than sucrose. It is not clear where the heavy carbon would go at polyol synthesis, but one might expect that it is retained in the substrates.…”
Section: Phloem Contents and Isotopic Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Our low sampling intensity could have obscured potential variation in δ 13 C ph during the course of the day (Gessler et al ., 2007) or with height along the trunk (e.g. Bogelein et al ., 2019). Still, our sampling protocol likely captured the actual variability in δ 13 C ph that would have had an imprint on monthly whole‐tree iWUE Δ .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf water Δ 18 O imparts its isotopic signature on many downstream processes including phloem sugars (Bögelein, Lehmann, & Thomas, 2019), needle cellulose (Wright & Leavitt, 2006) and tree‐ring cellulose (Roden et al, 2000). Given the magnitude of progressive isotope enrichment and the ample evidence for its prevalence, it is surprising that (to our knowledge) only one study has sought to track the implications of progressive enrichment of leaf water for leaf cellulose isotope ratios (Helliker & Ehleringer, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%