Differences in Clinical Features and Computed Tomographic Findings between Embolic and Non-Embolic Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Quantitative Differential Diagnosis.

Abstract

A diagnosis based on the presumed mechanismof stroke onset is useful for management strategies in acute ischemic stroke. Ninety-two patients with embolic (cardiac or artery-to-artery) and 107 with non-embolic (thrombotic or hemodynamic)stroke were diagnosed on strict cerebral angiographic criteria alone. To clearly discriminate between these two groups, the neurological and computed tomographic (CT) findings were then compared. Rapidity of onset, vomiting, urinary incontinence, level of consciousness, cervical bruit, anisocoria, tongue deviation, sensory disturbance, and CT findings (location ofhypodense area, findings of brain edema and hemorrhagic transformation) were discriminatory factors between the two groups (p<0.01). According to these ll items, weprepared a numerical table for quantitative differential diagnosis. A diagnostic accuracy of 98.9% for embolic and 87.9% for non-embolic stroke in internal verification, and 90.0% and 82.9% , respectively, in external verification was observed. The differences in clinical features and CTfindings between embolic and non-embolic stroke may reflect the pathophysiological mechanisms of the occlusive process of cerebral artery as well as the extent and severity of ischemia.

Cross Sectional Study of Depression in Patients following a Stroke: A Neurologists Perspective

“…Approximately 15% patients suffer hemorrhagic stroke in which is due to rupture of a blood vessel supplying various parts of brain. [6] In minority of the patients stroke is secondary to factors such as ruptured berry aneurysm, post-viral angiopathy, cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy, leukoencephalopathyand the amyloid angiopathies. [7] Majority of the patients are expected to survive first month after stroke.…”