Differences in content and organisational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes

Abstract

The aim was to study the overall content and organisational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes from a global perspective in order to get an initial appraisal on the degree of heterogeneity worldwide.A 12-question survey on content and organisational aspects was completed by representatives of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes that had previously participated in the European Respiratory Society (ERS) COPD Audit. Moreover, all ERS members affiliated with the ERS Rehabilitation and Chronic Care and/or Physiotherapists Scientific Groups, all members of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, and all American Thoracic Society Pulmonary Rehabilitation Assembly members were asked to complete the survey via multiple e-mailings.The survey has been completed by representatives of 430 centres from 40 countries. The findings demonstrate large differences among pulmonary rehabilitation programmes across continents for all aspects that were surveyed, including the setting, the case mix of individuals with a chronic respiratory disease, composition of the pulmonary rehabilitation team, completion rates, methods of referral and types of reimbursement.The current findings stress the importance of future development of processes and performance metrics to monitor pulmonary rehabilitation programmes, to be able to start international benchmarking, and to provide recommendations for international standards based on evidence and best practice. @ERSpublications Differences in aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes suggest caution in generalisation of research findings

Risk of death and readmission of hospital-admitted COPD exacerbations: European COPD Audit

“…Pulmonary rehabilitation programmes following acute exacerbation of COPD have effectively reduced readmission and mortality [28,29]. Moreover the inclusion of a number of interventions into a discharge care bundle [30,31] has also been shown to reduce readmission rates.…”

Effects of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Exacerbation Number and Severity in People With COPD

“…Surveys have suggested that the provision of pulmonary rehabilitation services can vary both within and between countries. 27 This highlights the need for pulmonary rehabilitation courses to be accredited and able to demonstrate adherence to the standards found in RCTs to be of maximum benefit to patients. This study also highlights the need for GPs to record completers of pulmonary rehabilitation for measurement of more accurate and meaningful outcomes.…”

Differential response to pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: multidimensional profiling

“…Since financial resources for PR are often limited or even non-existing [4], identification of (clusters of ) patients that do (or do not) respond to PR will become necessary in the near future to improve its cost-effectiveness. This requires consensus about the key performance measures of PR services.…”