2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77848-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in cortical structure between cognitively normal East Asian and Caucasian older adults: a surface-based morphometry study

Abstract: There is a growing literature on the impact of ethnicity on brain structure and function. Despite the regional heterogeneity in age-related changes and non-uniformity across brain morphometry measurements in the aging process, paucity of studies investigated the difference in cortical anatomy between the East Asian and Caucasian older adults. The present study aimed to compare cortical anatomy measurements, including cortical thickness, volume and surface area, between cognitively normal East Asian (n = 171) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unexpectedly, in the J-ADNI cohort, the calculated MAE for the OPLS model was smaller than for the CNN model. A potential explanation could be the difference in ethnicity which has been discussed elsewhere (Choi et al, 2020; Kang et al, 2020; Tang et al, 2018). Different ethnical populations can present differences in brain morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unexpectedly, in the J-ADNI cohort, the calculated MAE for the OPLS model was smaller than for the CNN model. A potential explanation could be the difference in ethnicity which has been discussed elsewhere (Choi et al, 2020; Kang et al, 2020; Tang et al, 2018). Different ethnical populations can present differences in brain morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential explanation could be the difference in ethnicity which has been discussed elsewhere (Choi et al, 2020;Kang et al, 2020;Tang et al, 2018). Different ethnical populations can present differences in brain morphology.…”
Section: Validation In External Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different MR imaging procedures and measurement software were used for the NF1 group and the unaffected comparison control group. As well, the NF1 and comparison groups probably differed in ancestry, and some differences in brain morphology have been associated with ethnicity [ 48 50 ]. However, all of the statistically significant differences in brain morphological measurements that we observed between NF1 and control subjects were relatively large (> 0.05 cm), and the differences in white matter volume found in our companion paper were in comparison to a control group studied in Hamburg using the same MRI scanners as these NF1 patients [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, for some of the brain areas in which we found differences between the Japanese and the German sample, differences between “Eastern” and “Western” cultures have been reported previously. For example, differences between healthy Koreans and (white) US-Americans have been reported in the postcentral gyrus, bilateral inferior temporal gyrus, transversetemporal cortex, lingual gyrus, and lateral occipital cortex 29 . Because our statistical analyses take into account the cortical measures of both healthy participants and patients across the two study sites, our results are unlikely to be affected by any baseline differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, compared to (white) US-American participants, Korean participants had greater cortical thickness in areas such as the postcentral gyrus and the bilateral inferior temporal gyrus. US-Americans, on the other hand, showed more cortical thickness in the left transversetemporal cortex, lingual gyrus, and right lateral occipital cortex 29 . Interestingly, there also seems to be evidence for the fact that differences between international samples are age-dependent 30 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%