2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in cytocompatibility and hemocompatibility between carbon nanotubes and nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brought to you by | MIT Libraries Authenticated Download Date | 5/9/18 7:10 AM MWCNT [23]. The electrochemical data also indicated that CNx electrode with the lowest nitrogen content (1 atom %) showed the highest reversible capacity 270 mAh g -1 at the current density of 0.2 mA cm -2 and the highest value of exchange current density [54,56].…”
Section: Electrochemical Modificationmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Brought to you by | MIT Libraries Authenticated Download Date | 5/9/18 7:10 AM MWCNT [23]. The electrochemical data also indicated that CNx electrode with the lowest nitrogen content (1 atom %) showed the highest reversible capacity 270 mAh g -1 at the current density of 0.2 mA cm -2 and the highest value of exchange current density [54,56].…”
Section: Electrochemical Modificationmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Copyright doping) to the p-type conduction (B substitution of boron in lattice) [21]. To solve the dispersion problem and to enhance the reactivity, the CNTs have been modified and functionalized for their application in electronics [22][23][24], clinical and biomedical [23], liquid-phase reactions [25], power sources filed [26][27][28] as nanoenergetic materials [29], and as gas sensors [30][31][32]. For the purpose of this review, we will also focus their representative/promising applications in the described fields covering from building materials to biological materials and from the electrical devices to the high nanoenergetic materials.…”
Section: Figure 2 (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 However, the fibril structure of pristine CNTs has rather inaccessible hollow interiors and may cause severe inflammatory response and cytotoxic effects in biological systems. 3,4 Nitrogen-doped CNTs, on the other hand, have been found to possess higher biocompatibility than undoped multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) 5,6 and may have better drug delivery performance. Doping of nitrogen atoms into the nanotube graphitic lattices results in a compartmented hollow structure resembling stacked cups which can be separated out to obtain individual nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube cups (NCNCs) with typical length under 200 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNTs are tiny hollow cylinders, made from a single, double, or several layers of graphene that are concentrically arranged and capped by fullerene hemispheres. They have diameters ranging from 0.4 to 2 nm for single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and from 2 to 200 nm for multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), and lengths ranging from hundreds of nanometers to micrometers [1][2][3]. Since CNTs have an asbestos-like shape, research into their toxicity and potential risks to human health has been intensified [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical doping (carbon atoms substitution) with nitrogen of CNTs (CN x ) was suggested to have positive effects on mice survival [8] and showed an improvement in cell-adhesion strength, viability, and proliferation of mammalian cells [3,9], in contrast with the MWCNT. However, cytotoxic effects of CN x have also been reported, where long length CN x were more toxic than other functionalized CNTs [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%