2020
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in diagnosis, treatment, and survival rate of acute myeloid leukemia with or without disabilities: A national cohort study in the Republic of Korea

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of AML in Koreans increases noticeably at the age of 60, and the average onset age is known to be in the mid-60s. [6][7][8] However, since this patient is relatively young and a non-smoker, risk factor such as old age and smoking are unlikely to be the causes of this disease. In addition, all other well-known risk factors for AML, such as chemotherapy, radiation exposure, infection, hematopoietic disorder, genetic disorder, and family history of AML, are not applicable in this patient, and was excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The prevalence of AML in Koreans increases noticeably at the age of 60, and the average onset age is known to be in the mid-60s. [6][7][8] However, since this patient is relatively young and a non-smoker, risk factor such as old age and smoking are unlikely to be the causes of this disease. In addition, all other well-known risk factors for AML, such as chemotherapy, radiation exposure, infection, hematopoietic disorder, genetic disorder, and family history of AML, are not applicable in this patient, and was excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…(41,44,49,63,67) In studies that examined survival in cancer patients with all types of disability, there seemed to be far worse outcomes for those with severe disabilities and with intellectual impairment, with a large portion of that disparity not justifiable on the basis of rational clinical decisions. (19,22,65) However, it had a high risk of bias since the incidence of disability in its retrospective cohort was inexplicably only half of the known national incidence, suggesting severe misclassification bias, and data about gender and degree of disability was missing.…”
Section: Outcome Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…physical/communication/mental/internal organ/others). (19,22,23,43,(61)(62)(63)(64)(65) Few studies differentiated by severity of impairment. (19,22,63,65,66)…”
Section: Types Of Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In case 1, the patient was still alive after 78 months. The survival of these patients was not as poor as expected for patients with t(3;21), with a reported median OS for AML and MDS in Korea of 15.7 and 17.7 months, respectively [ 7 , 8 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%