2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-017-1242-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in DNA methylation, DNA structure and embryogenesis-related gene expression between embryogenic and non embryogenic lines of Pinus radiata D. don

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WOX2 , the WUS homolog gene, has been proposed as an embryogenic potential marker for some Picea and Larix species, since it is not present in non-embryogenic lines (Palovaara and Hakman, 2008; Park et al, 2010). In contrast, WOX2 expression was detected in both embryogenic and non-embryogenic lines in P. radiata , although transcript levels were lower in the latter (Bravo et al, 2017). Maritime pine WOX gene family has been studied recently (Alvarez et al, 2018) and WOX2 expression has been shown to be highest at early embryogenic stages and decreased along the maturation process being lower in mature somatic embryos which agree with our WOX2 expression profile sampled at 0, 7, and 12 weeks in SK lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WOX2 , the WUS homolog gene, has been proposed as an embryogenic potential marker for some Picea and Larix species, since it is not present in non-embryogenic lines (Palovaara and Hakman, 2008; Park et al, 2010). In contrast, WOX2 expression was detected in both embryogenic and non-embryogenic lines in P. radiata , although transcript levels were lower in the latter (Bravo et al, 2017). Maritime pine WOX gene family has been studied recently (Alvarez et al, 2018) and WOX2 expression has been shown to be highest at early embryogenic stages and decreased along the maturation process being lower in mature somatic embryos which agree with our WOX2 expression profile sampled at 0, 7, and 12 weeks in SK lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Although in some conifer species somatic embryos maturation can be achieved without ABA, those derived from ABA-supplemented medium displayed a coordinated growth, better morphology and the concomitant accumulation of lipids and storage proteins, while these features were lacking in embryos developed in the absence of ABA (Klimaszewska et al, 2016). Comparative studies on zygotic and somatic embryos have been performed in several conifer species regarding gene expression (Lara-Chavez et al, 2012; Morel et al, 2014b; Bravo et al, 2017), hormonal content (von Aderkas et al, 2001) and storage proteins(Tereso et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA methylation is important for somatic embryo development (Nic-Can et al, 2013; Yakovlev et al, 2016). In general, higher global DNA methylation has been found in non-embryogenic cultures of Pinus radiata (Bravo et al, 2017), P. nigra (Noceda et al, 2009), Rosa x hybrid (Xu et al, 2004), and Eleutherococcus senticosus (Chakrabarty et al, 2003), while low global DNA methylation has been found in embryogenic cultures of several plants. In Quercus alba DNA is demethylation during the induction of SE (Corredoira et al, 2017), as well as during the generation of pro-embryogenic mass, but it gradually increases as the embryo is developing (LoSchiavo et al, 1989).…”
Section: Epigeneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have already compared embryogenic and non-embryogenic tissues of several coniferous genera ( Araucaria, Larix, Picea , and Pinus spp.) in terms of targeted gene expression (including miRNA), DNA methylation, and transcriptomic or proteomic profiling (reviewed in Miguel et al, 2016; Bravo et al, 2017; Klubicová et al, 2017). Putative marker genes of embryogenic state have been highlighted, including some that are reportedly involved in embryogenic induction in higher plants (Elhiti et al, 2013; Mahdavi-Darvari et al, 2015), particularly totipotency and commitment to somatic embryogenesis, e.g., WUS / WOX2, LEC1 / CHAP3A and BBM / SAP2C (Miguel et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%