2014
DOI: 10.1108/raf-10-2012-0098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in earnings management between firms using US GAAP and IAS/IFRS

Abstract: 2013),"Earnings quality and the adoption of IFRS-based accounting standards: Evidence from an emerging market", Asian Review of Accounting, Vol. 21 Iss 1 pp. 53-73 http://dx.If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…They find that the earnings management through accruals decreased after using the new set of standards in China. Similar to prior findings, Liu et al (2014) demonstrate that earnings management through accruals is not significantly different between US GAAP and IAS/IFRS firms. According to earlier research, earnings management has a strong association with earnings quality.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…They find that the earnings management through accruals decreased after using the new set of standards in China. Similar to prior findings, Liu et al (2014) demonstrate that earnings management through accruals is not significantly different between US GAAP and IAS/IFRS firms. According to earlier research, earnings management has a strong association with earnings quality.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Several studies have been conducted to compare various national accounting standards (GAAP) to the much-acclaimed transparent reporting standards (IFRS) using various proxies. For instance, studies which compared the US rules-based GAAP with the more principles-based (IAS/IFRS) on the basis of their ability to reduce earnings management found no significant difference in earnings management through accruals except that earnings management is significantly higher under research and development investment for firms reporting under IAS/IFRS (Liu et al, 2014). The superiority of US GAAP relative to IFRS is also evident in terms of its future cash flow predictability (Atwood et al, 2011).…”
Section: Ifrs and Reporting Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, many studies (Francoeur et al,2012;Datta et al, 2013;Chiu, et al,2013;Kangarluei et al, 2011;Essid, 2012;Caton et al,2011;He et al, 2011Degeorge et al, 2013Hansen, 2010;Liu et al, 2014;Sun et al, 2014) related to earnings management focus only on identifying related factors that can significantly affect earnings management. However, these factors have not been used directly to forecast the level of earnings management in advance (Tsai & Chiou, 2009).…”
Section: Real Earnings Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these factors have not been used directly to forecast the level of earnings management in advance (Tsai & Chiou, 2009). Previous research has also examined earnings management by considering the decomposition of total accruals into their abnormal and discretionary components (Louis, 2004;Matsumoto, 2002;Roychowdhury, 2006;Jones, 1991;Dechow, et al,1995;Liu et al,2014;Patro and Pattanayak, 2014;Greiner, 2015). The conventional earnings management (i.e., linear accrual) models assume that the slope coefficients are constant within the sample, which means that observations in the sample have a uniform accrual-generating process (Bartov et al, 2000).…”
Section: Real Earnings Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%