2006
DOI: 10.1163/156853906775897897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in female preference for male body size in Poecilia latipinna using simultaneous versus sequential stimulus presentation designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in many species sequential choice tests clearly elicit a response when mate choice is considered (e.g., Bakker and Milinski 1991;Bateman et al 2001;Pitcher et al 2003;Wong et al 2004). Still, female sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) show weaker expression of mating preferences in sequential tests compared with simultaneous designs (MacLaren and Rowland 2006). Like in the present study, social attraction may override an existing preference in the sequential choice situation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 40%
“…On the other hand, in many species sequential choice tests clearly elicit a response when mate choice is considered (e.g., Bakker and Milinski 1991;Bateman et al 2001;Pitcher et al 2003;Wong et al 2004). Still, female sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) show weaker expression of mating preferences in sequential tests compared with simultaneous designs (MacLaren and Rowland 2006). Like in the present study, social attraction may override an existing preference in the sequential choice situation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 40%
“…We cannot entirely exclude that the difference in outcome is due to the fact that we presented the intruder mounts simultaneously in the resident males' territories, whereas Alonso-Alvarez et al (2004) presented the models sequentially. However, this methodological difference seems an unlikely explanation for the lack of effect in our study, because choice tests with simultaneous presentation of test stimuli are believed to generally give higher resolution in discrimination by the focal animal (MacLaren & Rowland, 2006). Also, the encounter of more than one opponent at the same time is not an unusual situation for wild blue tits, because agonistic interactions regularly involve more than two individuals, especially within winter foraging flocks (Korsten, P., personal observation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…We presented the two male mounts with the different UV treatments simultaneously. This new experimental set-up has the advantage of a direct comparison of resident males' reactions to the different intruder types, while controlling for irrelevant variation in male reactions due to for example differences in the timing of the mount presentation, the motivation of the males, or the presence or absence of the female mate during the simulated intrusion (for further discussion of sequential versus simultaneous stimulus presentations in choice tests, see also MacLaren & Rowland, 2006). To control for possible mount effects we switched the UV-reduced and control treatment regularly between both mounts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, shoaling may increase levels of female–female competition (Forsgren et al , 2004). Second, ready‐to‐spawn males will typically encounter many females simultaneously, making direct comparisons easier (MacLaren & Rowland, 2006) and reducing costs of male choice (Wagner, 1998; Wong & Svensson, 2009). Indeed, G. flavescens males strongly prefer the most ornamented of simultaneously presented females (Amundsen & Forsgren, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%