2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-019-00875-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in fish harvest, fishing effort, and angling guard activities between urban and natural fishing grounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The streams are located mostly in the lowlands (200-600 m above sea level), are 2-8 m wide (the median value is 3 m), have mesotrophic or eutrophic nutrient levels, and have a fish biomass of 150-300 kg per hectare. They are dominated by brown trout Salmo trutta and gudgeon Gobio gobio [11].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The streams are located mostly in the lowlands (200-600 m above sea level), are 2-8 m wide (the median value is 3 m), have mesotrophic or eutrophic nutrient levels, and have a fish biomass of 150-300 kg per hectare. They are dominated by brown trout Salmo trutta and gudgeon Gobio gobio [11].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 170,000 fish weighing 87 tons were harvested in the streams of the Bohemian region in the year 2020 [12]. This number is declining every year and fell by 10% over the years 2000-2018 [11]. Anglers mostly harvested salmonids, mainly rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (70% by biomass), brown trout Salmo trutta (10%), and European grayling Thymallus thymallus (2%).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%