2022
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2022.2107603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in High- and Low-Performing Students’ Fraction Learning in the Fourth Grade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this definition, we distinguish underachieving students from low-performing students. In the research literature, low-performing students are usually identified through the administration of a standardized test, as those students who fail to meet some form of minimum standard (Han et al, 2015), or whose performance places them in, for example, the bottom quartile (Pedersen et al, 2022).…”
Section: Background Literature 21 Underachievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From this definition, we distinguish underachieving students from low-performing students. In the research literature, low-performing students are usually identified through the administration of a standardized test, as those students who fail to meet some form of minimum standard (Han et al, 2015), or whose performance places them in, for example, the bottom quartile (Pedersen et al, 2022).…”
Section: Background Literature 21 Underachievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the notion of underachieving students in mathematics refers to those students: who are somewhat disengaged from their mathematics learning, such that this disengagement stems from gaps in content knowledge, rather than additional issues beyond the mathematics classroom (e.g., significant behavioral issues); who are currently below average performers however do not have a mathematics learning disability (e.g., students in second bottom quintile for mathematics performance); for whom their mathematics teacher believes could “catch up” to (or even surpass) their average performing peers with additional, time-limited supports being made available (e.g., over 6–12 months). From this definition, we distinguish underachieving students from low-performing students. In the research literature, low-performing students are usually identified through the administration of a standardized test, as those students who fail to meet some form of minimum standard (Han et al, 2015), or whose performance places them in, for example, the bottom quartile (Pedersen et al, 2022).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Denmark, little research has been conducted on knowledge regarding how students understand, and misunderstand, fractions or rational numbers. One study from 2022 examines differences in fraction learning among high-and low-performing Danish 11-12-year-old students (Pedersen et al, 2022). The authors conclude that while high-performing students learn fractions continuously throughout the observed school year, low-performing students only learn fractions when instructed directly in fractions.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in mathematics education underscores the pivotal role of understanding fraction concepts in students' progression toward more advanced mathematical learning (Leng et al, 2020;Pedersen et al, 2022). A proficient grasp of fractions profoundly influences students' overall mathematical achievements and equips them with essential skills for mastering more advanced mathematical concepts (Copur-Gencturk, 2021;Hunt et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%