2023
DOI: 10.3390/ma16041505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in In Vitro Bacterial Adherence between Ti6Al4V and CoCrMo Alloys

Abstract: Prosthetic joint infection is an uncommon entity, but it supposes high costs, both from the economic side to the health systems and from the emotional side of the patient. The evaluation of the bacterial adherence to different materials frequently involved in joint prostheses allows us to better understand the mechanisms underlying this and provide information for the future development of prevention strategies. This study evaluated the bacterial adherence of four different species (Staphylococcus aureus, Stap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no clear explanation for this difference. It could be due to the different susceptibility of the two species to the compounds in the anodic layer, the different adaptive responses to environmental changes, or even the fact that the different species may have different behavior when colonizing different materials, as has been the case with other organisms ( 46 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no clear explanation for this difference. It could be due to the different susceptibility of the two species to the compounds in the anodic layer, the different adaptive responses to environmental changes, or even the fact that the different species may have different behavior when colonizing different materials, as has been the case with other organisms ( 46 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have demonstrated lesion heterogeneity, with host factors playing a crucial role in pathogenesis [20]. Furthermore, no studies on adherence or biofilm development onto the materials used in prostheses have been conducted; the potential for M. tuberculosis biofilm development on these surfaces may differ from what is described, as demonstrated in other microorganisms [21]. These factors could provide an explanation for the favorable outcomes observed in some cases, where surgery was not performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%