2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Individual-Level Terrorism Preparedness in Los Angeles County

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
152
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
13
152
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive association of higher education level with stockpiling is consistent with previous studies [11,25]. However, for other preparedness activities, especially carrying prescription/treatment records and an emergency communication plan, the opposite associations were observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The positive association of higher education level with stockpiling is consistent with previous studies [11,25]. However, for other preparedness activities, especially carrying prescription/treatment records and an emergency communication plan, the opposite associations were observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A recent study that used the survey data of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) in the USA concluded that vulnerable populations were more likely to have a supply of medication but less likely to have an emergency evacuation plan than their healthier counterparts [12]. These findings are not consistent with those of other studies in which the preparedness activities and vulnerability variables investigated varied between study [11,[13][14][15]. In addition, in these studies, differences in preparedness status according to the level of vulnerability, such as disability level and functional status, among the medically vulnerable populations chosen for study were not fully examined, even though understanding the preparedness status at a specific level of vulnerability is essential for more effective and efficient public health interventions.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations