2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2012.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in kainate receptor involvement in hippocampal mossy fibre long-term potentiation depending on slice orientation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to KARs, the finding that ACET when applied alone had no effect on LTP is consistent with our observations in transverse slices but contrasts with our findings in parasagittal slices, where ACET fully blocked LTP (Dargan et al, ; Sherwood et al, ). Indeed, when using parasagittal brain slices, we have observed the block of LTP by six structurally distinct KAR antagonists over a 20,000‐fold concentration range (Jane et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With respect to KARs, the finding that ACET when applied alone had no effect on LTP is consistent with our observations in transverse slices but contrasts with our findings in parasagittal slices, where ACET fully blocked LTP (Dargan et al, ; Sherwood et al, ). Indeed, when using parasagittal brain slices, we have observed the block of LTP by six structurally distinct KAR antagonists over a 20,000‐fold concentration range (Jane et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These fEPSPs had an onset latency of 2-3 ms and a peak of 7-10 ms (Derrick and Martinez, 1994). (2S,2 0 R,3 0 R)-2-(2 0 ,3 0 -dicarboxycyclopropyl)glycine) (DCG-IV) was applied at the end of all MF experiments to confirm the absence of associational/commissural pathway contamination (Kamiya et al, 1996;Yeckel et al, 1999;Hagena and Manahan-Vaughan, 2010;Sherwood et al, 2012). The experiments where DCG-IV did not depress the fEPSP slope by at least 70% were excluded from any analysis, for the concern of contamination from another form of LTP.…”
Section: Electrophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trigger for pre-LTP at mossy fiber synapses involves kainate receptors (KARs) (Bortolotto et al, 1999; Contractor et al, 2011; Jane et al, 2009). Although the subtype of KAR involved may depend on the precise anatomical connection (Sherwood et al, 2012), in some cases there is a requirement for GluK1-containing KARs (Bortolotto et al, 1999). The transduction of pre-LTP involves activation of adenylyl cyclase (AC), production of cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate (cAMP), and activation of protein kinase A (PKA) (Nicoll and Schmitz, 2005), and the expression of pre-LTP may involve hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels (Chevaleyre and Castillo, 2002; Mellor et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a discordance amongst the studies that have examined LTP following MPTP lesion, which is most likely caused by different experimental approaches e.g. varying timeframes post-MPTP, different schedule of MPTP treatment, different protocol to induce LTP and different origins/orientations of the slices along the dorso-ventral axis of the hippocampus224748. No previous studies have differentiated between dHip and vHip22454647.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%