2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in knee adduction moment between healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis depend on the knee axis definition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, large errors in the calculation of the secondary kinematics (varus-valgus angle) are expected when using TEA to calculate knee angles [ 70 74 ]. Secondly, by tracking the secondary kinematics, models do not take load-dependency effects into account [ 54 , 74 77 ] that may be relevant especially in patients with knee OA [ 74 ] as they normally present more joint instability [ 78 ]. Indeed, in a previous study [ 74 ], the effect of the knee axis on the calculated KAM was assessed, which underlined the sensitivity of KAM to knee axis definition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, large errors in the calculation of the secondary kinematics (varus-valgus angle) are expected when using TEA to calculate knee angles [ 70 74 ]. Secondly, by tracking the secondary kinematics, models do not take load-dependency effects into account [ 54 , 74 77 ] that may be relevant especially in patients with knee OA [ 74 ] as they normally present more joint instability [ 78 ]. Indeed, in a previous study [ 74 ], the effect of the knee axis on the calculated KAM was assessed, which underlined the sensitivity of KAM to knee axis definition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, by tracking the secondary kinematics, models do not take load-dependency effects into account [ 54 , 74 77 ] that may be relevant especially in patients with knee OA [ 74 ] as they normally present more joint instability [ 78 ]. Indeed, in a previous study [ 74 ], the effect of the knee axis on the calculated KAM was assessed, which underlined the sensitivity of KAM to knee axis definition. The current knee model includes six degrees of freedom in the tibiofemoral and six in the patellofemoral joints and accounts for load-dependent effects in the moment calculation that may explain the differences in angles and moments compared to previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A non-frictional patella articulated with the femur and prescribed by the knee angle was also added to direct the quadriceps force, wrapping around the patella and attaching to the tibial tuberosity (DeMers et al, 2014). The default model included a hinge joint for flexion-extension of the knee, and was extended to include abduction-adduction motion based on a previous study (Meireles et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found peak extension moments of approximately 0.5-0.7 Nm.kg −1 in the lead leg during the downswing in the skilled golfers but clear extension peaks were not evident in the lead leg data of the unskilled group. Although there are no definitive magnitudes for injury-causing moments in golf, the values obtained were higher than those of 0.46 N.m.kg −1 for gait (Meireles, De Groote, Van Rossoma, Verschueren, & Jonkers, 2017). Thorp et al (2006) noted that a single peak external moment only reflects the load on a joint at a single time point, however this does not account for the combined load throughout the duration of the movement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%